Obama is coming for your guns!

[matteos]

Originally Posted by Ike Bana

Where did I suggest that American police should not have guns? Of course American police should have guns. And American civilians should not. They ain't good for nuthin' but put a man six feet in a whole. And all too often due to the sick behavior of way too many American men...put way too many innocent women six feet in a hole.

And I'm sick to my stomach hearing about how this country should remain fucking stupid because we're not Britain, or Germany, or Denmark.

Armed police with no right to carry. .. especially America's Gung ho cops... no thank-you. Thats the worst of both worlds.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by Boreas

The apparent paradox of fewer people owning guns than previously and of more guns in private hand than ever before is actually pretty scary when you understand that the reason for it is that the gun nuts, the militia types, the white supremacists and the sovereign citizens have armed themselves to the teeth and are itching for a fight.

John

That's why I want an AH64 with a full complement of weaponry John. Hellfires, AMRAAMs and that wicked chaingun. I have one of those fucktard Teabagger militia types three doors down. He's a loon when he's outta weed.
It's kinda like having DJ as a neighbor. Just kidding, maybe.

I'd settle for a Kiowa though.

[Ike Bana]

Originally Posted by matteos

Armed police with no right to carry. .. especially America's Gung ho cops... no thank-you. Thats the worst of both worlds.

With guns when I'm king you won't have the right to carry. If they're for defense of the sovereignty of home as was pitched to the SCOTUS you don't need to carry.

Mentally ill sovereign citizens, idiot gunners who should have spent the money on the penile implant, the matteos' of the world walking around armed...no thank you. That's lunatic hell on earth.

[Ike Bana]

Originally Posted by Boreas

The apparent paradox of fewer people owning guns than previously and of more guns in private hand than ever before is actually pretty scary when you understand that the reason for it is that the gun nuts, the militia types, the white supremacists and the sovereign citizens have armed themselves to the teeth and are itching for a fight.

John

All the more reason to end legal possession of handguns, semi-autos, 50 BMG's and any other weapon, the loss of which would upset anybody.

[Ike Bana]

BTW - this whole "examination" of the problem is just hypocrit right-wing gunner interference in solving the problem.

The two primary areas of "examination" are:

1. How do we keep firearms out of the hands of criminals.
2. How do we keep firearms out of the hands of the mentally ill.

These seem to be the two primary areas of "examination" that right-wingjobs refer to in every conversation. Get the guns out of the hands of criminals and crazy people and the problem goes away.

Really?

1. Go check the history of school massacres or any other mass shootings in this country. How many of the perps had felony criminal records, which would have precluded them from legal ownership of a firearm? If it's any...it's very few.

2. Why are we going to discriminate against the mentally ill who have no felony criminal record? Last I heard the right had a problem with denying gun ownership to the blind. If a blind guy can own a handgun, why can't my brother-in-law with panic disorder?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...blind/2780303/

Unbelievable.

[Pio1980]

Do high capacity rapid fire tactical war toys really belong in private hands, never mind arsenal hoarders in whatever mental state generates that expression of insecurity.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by Ike Bana

BTW - this whole "examination" of the problem is just hypocrit right-wing gunner interference in solving the problem.

The two primary areas of "examination" are:

1. How do we keep firearms out of the hands of criminals.
2. How do we keep firearms out of the hands of the mentally ill.

These seem to be the two primary areas of "examination" that right-wingjobs refer to in every conversation. Get the guns out of the hands of criminals and crazy people and the problem goes away.

Really?

1. Go check the history of school massacres or any other mass shootings in this country. How many of the perps had felony criminal records, which would have precluded them from legal ownership of a firearm? If it's any...it's very few.

2. Why are we going to discriminate against the mentally ill who have no felony criminal record? Last I heard the right had a problem with denying gun ownership to the blind. If a blind guy can own a handgun, why can't my brother-in-law with panic disorder?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...blind/2780303/

Unbelievable.

I've read that ~25% suffer from some sort of "mental disorders" over a their lifetime. Another ~9% have had a felony conviction in their lifetimes.

Adjudicating the withholding of a constitutional right to ~1/3 of the population would be tricky at best and probably something the NRA would strongly oppose if it ever came to that. They just want us to believe that they're reasonable and would support it. I don't believe it for a minute.

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by Pio1980

Do high capacity rapid fire tactical war toys really belong in private hands, never mind arsenal hoarders in whatever mental state generates that expression of insecurity.

Absolutely not.

They don't belong in civilian Police Departments either.

[matteos]

Originally Posted by Ike Bana

With guns when I'm king you won't have the right to carry. If they're for defense of the sovereignty of home as was pitched to the SCOTUS you don't need to carry.

Mentally ill sovereign citizens, idiot gunners who should have spent the money on the penile implant, the matteos' of the world walking around armed...no thank you. That's lunatic hell on earth.

String a coherent sentence together and I shall respond.

[merrylander]

Originally Posted by Ike Bana

2. Why are we going to discriminate against the mentally ill who have no felony criminal record? Last I heard the right had a problem with denying gun ownership to the blind. If a blind guy can own a handgun, why can't my brother-in-law with panic disorder?

Interestingly enough a building where I once worked in NoVa the elevators in the parking garage had the floor numbers in Braille.