Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Off-topic
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-26-2010, 05:39 PM
Combwork's Avatar
Combwork Combwork is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 658
A bomb treaty.

Don't know how effective this one will be but I'm curious. This may sound like a daft question, but can a nuclear warhead be dismantled and used as fuel for a nuclear reactor?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-26-2010, 05:50 PM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
yes

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/10/bu...t/10nukes.html
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-26-2010, 06:12 PM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Poetic isn't it?

Regards,

D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-26-2010, 06:13 PM
Twodogs's Avatar
Twodogs Twodogs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Cowtown
Posts: 2,460
Nuclear warhead is a broad term. If it's a "real" one like we have, I imagine you could at least use the fuel/uranium. It certainly wouldn't be the cheapest way to go, seeing how weapons grade Uranium involves a lot of material and time in a purification process that powerhouse fuel does not require.
__________________
"The Tree of Liberty must be refreshed at times, with the blood of Tyrants."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-27-2010, 02:30 AM
Combwork's Avatar
Combwork Combwork is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 658
Thanks for the information.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twodogs View Post
Nuclear warhead is a broad term. If it's a "real" one like we have, I imagine you could at least use the fuel/uranium. It certainly wouldn't be the cheapest way to go, seeing how weapons grade Uranium involves a lot of material and time in a purification process that powerhouse fuel does not require.
Much appreciated. It wasn't really a query about relative costs but if the stuff already exists I was curious about what's done with it. I grew up on an R.A.F. base; everyone apart from a few crazies knew it wasn't a matter of if, but when.

It's good to find sometimes the loonies really do rule the asylum.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-27-2010, 05:20 AM
Sandy G Sandy G is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,354
You didn't grow up at Bentwaters, did you ? (Shudder...)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-28-2010, 03:53 AM
Combwork's Avatar
Combwork Combwork is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 658
Bicester

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandy G View Post
You didn't grow up at Bentwaters, did you ? (Shudder...)
No, I spent most of my childhood until I was about 10 at Bicester R.A.F. base in Oxfordshire. The U.S.A.F. base at Upper Hayford was just down the road from us. This was in the early 1950's when a lot of runways were the same as used in WW2. Bombers were just too big to use a short runway so to get them off the ground they used JATO bottles strapped under the wings.

Solid fuel boosters. Re-usable, they'd be dropped off when the plane reached take off speed. Not dissimilar to the solid fuel boosters used on the Space Shuttle and like them, if they misfired the airplane was in deep shit. Landing was something else. Again like the Shuttle, parachutes were deployed to slow the thing down, quite an impressive display for a small boy.

When you think back on it, putting aircraft like the Vulcan and B52 allegedly carrying an atomic bomb onto a runway that was known to be too short was kind of risky, wasn't it? The only major incident that the public are aware of was when a U.S.A.F. bomber (can't remember the type) carrying at least one atomic bomb (not a dummy) crash landed and caught fire. Fire crews attended and used all their water to cool the thing down; the crew were left to die.

Last edited by Combwork; 03-28-2010 at 06:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-28-2010, 09:59 AM
Zeke's Avatar
Zeke Zeke is offline
Sir Lord Vader of Cheam
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lewiston, ID
Posts: 5,069
Send a message via Yahoo to Zeke
Quote:
Originally Posted by Combwork View Post
No, I spent most of my childhood until I was about 10 at Bicester R.A.F. base in Oxfordshire. The U.S.A.F. base at Upper Hayford was just down the road from us. This was in the early 1950's when a lot of runways were the same as used in WW2. Bombers were just too big to use a short runway so to get them off the ground they used JATO bottles strapped under the wings.

Solid fuel boosters. Re-usable, they'd be dropped off when the plane reached take off speed. Not dissimilar to the solid fuel boosters used on the Space Shuttle and like them, if they misfired the airplane was in deep shit. Landing was something else. Again like the Shuttle, parachutes were deployed to slow the thing down, quite an impressive display for a small boy.

When you think back on it, putting aircraft like the Vulcan and B52 allegedly carrying an atomic bomb onto a runway that was known to be too short was kind of risky, wasn't it? The only major incident that the public are aware of was when a U.S.A.F. bomber (can't remember the type) carrying at least one atomic bomb (not a dummy) crash landed and caught fire. Fire crews attended and used all their water to cool the thing down; the crew were left to die.
I was an Air Force brat and spent some formative years in/around Upper Heyford. (My brother was born in Banbury.)

I always found it interesting that, other than the fight line, the base was -- essentially -- "open."

You've got F-111's, with tactical nukes, a thousand yards away, but anyone could walk darned near anywhere.

Odd...
__________________
"American" means calling everyone who disagrees with you a traitor?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-28-2010, 11:09 AM
Charles Charles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeke View Post
I was an Air Force brat and spent some formative years in/around Upper Heyford. (My brother was born in Banbury.)

I always found it interesting that, other than the fight line, the base was -- essentially -- "open."

You've got F-111's, with tactical nukes, a thousand yards away, but anyone could walk darned near anywhere.

Odd...
It was the same when I worked at Bergstrom back in the 80's. If you had the card on your windshield you went right on in. Never once did they stop me and look in my van.

I would have thought the security would have been a little tighter, even back then.

Chas
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.