Well, it's done

[Charles]

Originally Posted by noonereal

I am sorry rick but that is an asinine statement.

Sarah would be proud however.

Why do you/people post such trash?

Honest?

What doe sit do?

It makes sense to me.

The government does not produce wealth, they redistribute wealth. If everyone has their mouth planted firmly on the public tit, who, pray tell, will pay for it? Who will create the pork and beans?

I'm sure that even the Keynesians realize that you can only create so much fiat currency before there is a day of reckoning.

Chas

[epifanatic]

Originally Posted by rickr15

Why do you post the crap you do?
More than 50% of Americans did not want this. In a true democracy it would not have happened. BTW, Why do you have such a crush on Sarah Palin anyway? She is nothing to me.

We've already proven that this isn't a true democracy, GWB got elected, right?

[noonereal]

Originally Posted by Charles

It makes sense to me.

The government does not produce wealth, they redistribute wealth. If everyone has their mouth planted firmly on the public tit, who, pray tell, will pay for it? Who will create the pork and beans?

I'm sure that even the Keynesians realize that you can only create so much fiat currency before there is a day of reckoning.

Chas

Chas that is not what his post is about, I quote. "Quit your job. Get welfare and food stamps and all will be provided."

That is bull shit, nonsense and offensive.

His statement just fosters an inaccurate sentiment among many in this country and it needs to be called out for the trash it is. It's nothing more than a dishonest Rush line.

I do apologize for my more dismissive and less tolerant posts last night and today but having watched the folks on the right (and the left as well) blatantly lie and knowing that knuckle heads believe these lies has left to very frustrated.

This country is a nursery for legalized theft that we call capitalism/corporatism and neither side is willing to be honest about this.

[rickr15]

Originally Posted by epifanatic

We've already proven that this isn't a true democracy, GWB got elected, right?

Can't dispute that.

[noonereal]

Originally Posted by rickr15

I don't. I do become frustrated at times and then post less than politely but I don't parrot inane rhetoric.

I don't either. What does this havre to do with my post to you?

How do you know? We are lied to and mislead so that we have no idea what would have happened in a true democracy. My guess is that folks would band together in a true democracy and do what is good for the society as that would generally be best for the individual (just like in nature). However in this country there is a select group who have no need of societal protections and uses it's power to alter the reality of the masses thereby creating an arena where folks vote against issues in direct contrast to their own welfare.

I was always strangely attracted to trashy women, your not?

Then why do appear to parrot her?

Coincidence I guess.

[Charles]

Originally Posted by epifanatic

We've already proven that this isn't a true democracy, GWB got elected, right?

Becoming more like a Democracy and less like a Constitutional Republic every day.

Chas

[rickr15]

Originally Posted by noonereal

Then why do appear to parrot her?

Coincidence I guess.

Funny thing about you hardcore leftys on this site. You spout a party line and when someone disagrees with you you point little fingers and call people names. You're like naughty children.

Go ahead mean boy call me a righty corporate pig or whatever stokes your coals.

Point still remains the steaming pile they just dumped off on the American people is just that.

[noonereal]

Originally Posted by rickr15

Funny thing about you hardcore leftys on this site. You spout a party line and when someone disagrees with you you point little fingers and call people names. You're like naughty children.

Go ahead mean boy call me a righty corporate pig or whatever stokes your coals.

Point still remains the steaming pile they just dumped off on the American people is just that.

No substantive reply again?

BTW, this "hard core lefty" voted for way more republicans than Democratics over the years. It was not until the party was hijacked by idiocy (baby Bush) that I first cast a presidential vote for someone from the left. If you are happy with this "fools on parade" party as it has become, god bless.

By the way reread your post. Your post was not about the steaming pile they just dumped off on the American people, on that we agree. Your post as I point out above is about a ridiculous invalid stereotype of social assistance. Why can't you distinguish?

[rickr15]

Originally Posted by noonereal

No substantive reply again?

BTW, this "hard core lefty" voted for way more republicans than Democratics over the years. It was not until the party was hijacked by idiocy (baby Bush) that I first cast a presidential vote for someone from the left. If you are happy with this "fools on parade" party as it has become, god bless.

By the way reread your post. Your post was not about the steaming pile they just dumped off on the American people, on that we agree. Your post as I point out above is about a ridiculous invalid stereotype of social assistance. Why can't you distinguish?

I vote independent as my Sig says. What did you want answered? The crap about trashy women? Pelosi should get you reall hot then as she aint nuthin but trash.

As for the "social assistance" part,Sarcasm is a bad habit I have. Seems its much better tolerated when it comes from the left around here.

[noonereal]

Originally Posted by rickr15

I vote independent as my Sig says. What did you want answered? The crap about trashy women? Pelosi should get you reall hot then as she aint nuthin but trash.

As for the "social assistance" part,Sarcasm is a bad habit I have. Seems its much better tolerated when it comes from the left around here.

My question was simple, why do so many as you did distort the nature of social assistance for the needy in this country? You brought this up in post 7. I impolitely asked you for clarification in post 8.