18 and Dead.

[barbara]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

Here's a link to a video of Michael Brady giving his account.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYqrAhpo_w4

He was watching from inside his house and during the incident left the window and missed part of the incident.

Doesn't sound too reliable to me.

I'm waiting on the forensics to verify (or not) one of these eye witness accounts.

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by barbara

He was watching from inside his house and during the incident left the window and missed part of the incident.

Doesn't sound too reliable to me.

I'm waiting on the forensics to verify (or not) one of these eye witness accounts.

He's not the only one.

As for "forensics" this ain't CSI Miami.

The results are not going to be conclusive one way or the other.

[barbara]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

He's not the only one.



As for "forensics" this ain't CSI Miami.



The results are not going to be conclusive one way or the other.

Forensic results won't be conclusive by them self but will be used to verify eyewitness accounts and other evidence.

Like a puzzle, one has to look at all the pieces and how they fit together to see the big picture.

As far as the evidence.... Eye witness accounts are probably the least reliable evidence they have.

[Zeke]

Originally Posted by barbara

As far as the evidence.... Eye witness accounts are probably the least reliable evidence they have.

Every time.

[piece-itpete]

I thought there were differing stories between witnesses.

Pete

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by Zeke

Every time.

Then we can disregard Wilson's along with the others?

[Zeke]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

Then we can disregard Wilson's along with the others?

Eyewitness is NOT the same as personal involvement.

Any actual investigator knows this.

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by Zeke

Eyewitness is NOT the same as personal involvement.

Any actual investigator knows this.

So in a Homicide investigation is it customary to give more credence to the testimony of the killer instead of that of uninvolved eyewitnesses?

[Zeke]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

So in a Homicide investigation is it customary to give more credence to the testimony of the killer instead of that of uninvolved eyewitnesses?

Nobody knows better about their professional motivation to protect themselves and others.

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by Zeke

Nobody knows better about their professional motivation to protect themselves and others.

Would you say that officer Wilson has a vested personal interest in the outcome of this investigation?