Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #561  
Old 07-28-2014, 10:02 PM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ike Bana View Post
You got your "facts" I got mine.
You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.

I'm quoting a famous fellow, but let's just take it at face value.
Reply With Quote
  #562  
Old 07-29-2014, 02:01 AM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,451
"Under the spreading Chestnut Tree, where I saw you and you saw me."

Okay, so we have all seen each other and no one is going to change.........

Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
Reply With Quote
  #563  
Old 07-29-2014, 05:38 AM
JJIII's Avatar
JJIII JJIII is offline
AKA Sister Mary JJ
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Upper East Tennessee
Posts: 5,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreak View Post
"Under the spreading Chestnut Tree, where I saw you and you saw me."

Okay, so we have all seen each other and no one is going to change.........

Dave
Oh, but we have changed. Politicalchat started as a place where we discussed ideas and philosophies and now much of it is personal insults and name calling. IMO, the reason so many good posters have left. It's a damn shame.
__________________
"Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please." (Mark Twain)
Reply With Quote
  #564  
Old 07-29-2014, 07:46 AM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,554
Here's an interesting lament on the current state of Zionism from an espoused Zionist.

I am a Zionist because the story of my forebears convinces me that Jews needed the homeland voted into existence by United Nations Resolution 181 of 1947, calling for the establishment of two states — one Jewish, one Arab — in Mandate Palestine. I am a Zionist who believes in the words of Israel’s founding charter of 1948 declaring that the nascent state would be based “on freedom, justice and peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel.”

What I cannot accept, however, is the perversion of Zionism that has seen the inexorable growth of a Messianic Israeli nationalism claiming all the land between the Mediterranean and the Jordan River; that has, for almost a half-century now, produced the systematic oppression of another people in the West Bank; that has led to the steady expansion of Israeli settlements on the very West Bank land of any Palestinian state; that isolates moderate Palestinians like Salam Fayyad in the name of divide-and-rule; that pursues policies that will make it impossible to remain a Jewish and democratic state; that seeks tactical advantage rather than the strategic breakthrough of a two-state peace; that blockades Gaza with 1.8 million people locked in its prison and is then surprised by the periodic eruptions of the inmates; and that responds disproportionately to attack in a way that kills hundreds of children.


Is this fellow, like anyone else sharing his opinion, anti-Semitic?

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/30/op...s-in-gaza.html
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.

Last edited by finnbow; 07-29-2014 at 07:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #565  
Old 07-29-2014, 08:24 AM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
When did Zionists start moving into Palestine? How did they act when they did it? I know the story is they just occupied empty land after buying it from guys in Turkey. Do you believe that?
There have always been Jews in "Palestine." The history of "Palestine" is one of endless occupations by various tribes of people. The history goes back way past any occupation by the Turks. I understand it's not convenient history for you Zionism = racism types, or for the Zionism = Nazism types like Zeke. But that's just too goddamn bad.

Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
Jews and Muslims used to get along fine in Iraq, and Iran, and Syria, and Egypt, and all over the place. Did that change BECAUSE THEY WE JEWS? So did they become Jews in 1947? What were they before?
Before? Before, Jews were handy infidels to have around in Iraq, Iran, and Syria. They got along fine (if you consider tolerating somebody you consider to be scum as "fine") prior to any suggestion that any dirt actually belonged to any Jews. Once Jews became property owning neighbors...then they weren't so fine.

Last edited by Ike Bana; 07-29-2014 at 08:29 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #566  
Old 07-29-2014, 08:58 AM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
Here's an interesting lament on the current state of Zionism from an espoused Zionist.

I am a Zionist because the story of my forebears convinces me that Jews needed the homeland voted into existence by United Nations Resolution 181 of 1947, calling for the establishment of two states — one Jewish, one Arab — in Mandate Palestine. I am a Zionist who believes in the words of Israel’s founding charter of 1948 declaring that the nascent state would be based “on freedom, justice and peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel.”

What I cannot accept, however, is the perversion of Zionism that has seen the inexorable growth of a Messianic Israeli nationalism claiming all the land between the Mediterranean and the Jordan River; that has, for almost a half-century now, produced the systematic oppression of another people in the West Bank; that has led to the steady expansion of Israeli settlements on the very West Bank land of any Palestinian state; that isolates moderate Palestinians like Salam Fayyad in the name of divide-and-rule; that pursues policies that will make it impossible to remain a Jewish and democratic state; that seeks tactical advantage rather than the strategic breakthrough of a two-state peace; that blockades Gaza with 1.8 million people locked in its prison and is then surprised by the periodic eruptions of the inmates; and that responds disproportionately to attack in a way that kills hundreds of children.


Is this fellow, like anyone else sharing his opinion, anti-Semitic?

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/30/op...s-in-gaza.html
Roger Cohen has his opinion. There are lots of opinions, you got yours, I got mine, all gods children got opinion. If Roger Cohen wants to be a guilt ridden Zionist, that's Roger Cohen's business, not mine. It's easy to be a guilt-ridden Jew...nobody does guilt better than Jews, although the Irish are a close second. Roger Cohen has his history, good for him. Roger Cohen leaves out plenty of the local history of the partition of Palestine...it's convenient for Roger's guilt, I guess. Most important to me when he starts blubbering about grabbing all the land between the Mediterranean and the Jordan River, is how it came about that Israel felt the need to occupy the West Bank. The Hussein family says Hussein did not want to go to war with Israel in 1967, but he did it anyway...under "duress", his people insist. Who gives a shit...he attacked Israel.

In 1967, Jordan invaded Israel from the West Bank that they had illegally occupied since 1949 (with nary a peep outta any of the same people who have been terrorizing Israelis for 6 decades)...Israel drove them out, and drove them all the way to the East Bank. And Israel said to itself...Jordan is never gonna invade this country from the West Bank again. Not that the Armistice of 1949 lines were ever honored by Israel's friendly neighbors who only want peace anyway. Qalqilya on the eastern most edge of that armistice line is 8 miles from the Mediterranean. Eight miles to militarily cut the Nation of Israel in half. Roger Cohen apparently doesn't consider that to be an issue even though Israel has already been invaded from that area. Although Israel continued to suffer from terrorist activities from that area for decades thereafter. If Hussein had just told Nasser to take a hike in 1967, it's likely the history of the West Bank would have been completely different. Palestinians would still be meekly demanding their West Bank land from the royal house of Jordan, and still perping terrorism on Israel. Because it's not the West Bank or Gaza...it's Jews having ownership of any dirt in "Palestine".

In a poll from a few days ago, 86% of Israelis oppose any cease fire with Hamas. I suppose that means 86% of Israelis are bloodthirsty babykilling nazis, eh? Actually what 86% of Israelis are, is fearful of the next holocaust...which has been promised them by Hamas and their other peaceful neighbors.

Last edited by Ike Bana; 07-29-2014 at 09:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #567  
Old 07-29-2014, 09:02 AM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.
Easy for you to say when the deal is that only yours are facts and anybody else's are opinions.

Too bad you people aren't up to providing any historical basis for your "facts" that goes any further back than 1967. There were Jews living in the "holy land" for centuries before there was an Islami religion. Probably in the neighborhood of 25 centuries before Islam.

Last edited by Ike Bana; 07-29-2014 at 10:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #568  
Old 07-29-2014, 11:05 AM
Zeke's Avatar
Zeke Zeke is offline
Sir Lord Vader of Cheam
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lewiston, ID
Posts: 5,069
Send a message via Yahoo to Zeke
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ike Bana View Post
Easy for you to say when the deal is that only yours are facts and anybody else's are opinions.
But you don't have ANY facts.

So, is the IRA just a bunch of freedom fighters or do you want them wiped out like so many Palistinians?

Are you an apologist for both oppressors or just the ones that suit you?

You have ZERO intellect in ANY of your pseudo arguments.
__________________
"American" means calling everyone who disagrees with you a traitor?
Reply With Quote
  #569  
Old 07-29-2014, 11:12 AM
nailer's Avatar
nailer nailer is offline
Rational Anarchist
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
Here's an interesting lament on the current state of Zionism from an espoused Zionist.

"I am a Zionist ..."

Is this fellow, like anyone else sharing his opinion, anti-Semitic?

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/30/op...s-in-gaza.html
Actions speak louder than words.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."

Last edited by nailer; 07-29-2014 at 11:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #570  
Old 07-29-2014, 11:42 AM
Tom Joad's Avatar
Tom Joad Tom Joad is offline
Persona non grata
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 12,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ike Bana View Post
Actually what 86% of Israelis are, is fearful of the next holocaust...which has been promised them by Hamas and their other peaceful neighbors.
For something to be considered a threat I believe that the one making the threat has to have at least some remote possibility of actually carrying it out.

Hamas threatening to wipe Israel off the map is about like Gary Coleman (when he was alive) threatening to kick Ken Norton's ass.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncQbAHunyZ8
__________________
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.