Supremes vote for religious bigotry

[icenine]

Originally Posted by ebacon

I dunno that converting to Christian Science would do the trick. IMO management would have trouble convincing the court that they were practicing the religion in good faith instead of just using it as an excuse for financial gain. In plain language, they would have trouble passing the laugh test.

Well that is just it....how can you prove or disprove practicing in good faith?
How can you prove what a religion is on not is? L. Ron Hubbard invented one right?

[4-2-7]

Originally Posted by finnbow

IMO, those supporting this opinion are mostly doing so not out of concern for corporate religious freedom but out of their enmity towards Obamacare. Such folks will jump on board any effort to criticize Obamacare. Regardless of whether the decision was proper (I believe it wasn't), it stands to make women aware of the dangers of electing wingnuts to public office.

I would say you're close but it's much bigger. More of a push back to how Obama is running this country and thinks he is above the laws of the land.
Did you hear his speech yesterday? It's very disheartening listening to him be so divisive and thinking his way is the only way. Thinking he has some unlimited power that he can wheel to his base and screw the other 73% of the country.

He looks to me as playing a political game and that's all that matters. He looks to me as trying to force an impeachment action against him. If he can do this I think his administration feels they might get a momentum boost in 2016.

I feel this is the best time to take action against him because people are seeing the dictator within him. This country is not only comprised of far right Demarcrats.

[merrylander]

Originally Posted by 4-2-7

I would say you're close but it's much bigger. More of a push back to how Obama is running this country and thinks he is above the laws of the land.
Did you hear his speech yesterday? It's very disheartening listening to him be so divisive and thinking his way is the only way. Thinking he has some unlimited power that he can wheel to his base and screw the other 73% of the country.

He looks to me as playing a political game and that's all that matters. He looks to me as trying to force an impeachment action against him. If he can do this I think his administration feels they might get a momentum boost in 2016.

I feel this is the best time to take action against him because people are seeing the dictator within him. This country is not only comprised of far right Demarcrats.

What a hoot, since Congress has decided that inaction is the order of the day then a POTUS trying to accomplish anything for the benefit of the citizens is a dictator? Danny Boy those citizens elected him in a free and fair election. Your boy had his butt handed to him on a plate. Get over it.

By the way what in hell is a Demarcrat? Somebody that draws borders?

[ebacon]

Originally Posted by icenine

Well that is just it....how can you prove or disprove practicing in good faith?
How can you prove what a religion is on not is? L. Ron Hubbard invented one right?

The court will cross that bridge if it comes to it. I do not know the answer.

[ebacon]

Originally Posted by merrylander

. . . By the way what in hell is a Demarcrat? Somebody that draws borders?

ahhhahaha. Much needed humor.

[4-2-7]

Originally Posted by merrylander

What a hoot, since Congress has decided that inaction is the order of the day then a POTUS trying to accomplish anything for the benefit of the citizens is a dictator? Danny Boy those citizens elected him in a free and fair election. Your boy had his butt handed to him on a plate. Get over it.

By the way what in hell is a Demarcrat? Somebody that draws borders?

Inaction is atributed to two sides, it's called working together. we can go all day long as to who's fault it is but it gives no President the right to be a Dictator.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by 4-2-7

He looks to me as playing a political game and that's all that matters. He looks to me as trying to force an impeachment action against him. If he can do this I think his administration feels they might get a momentum boost in 2016.

I feel this is the best time to take action against him because people are seeing the dictator within him. This country is not only comprised of far right Demarcrats.

1. If he is looking to get impeached, why would you not take my bet.

2. How does an impeachment action against him help his party in 2016? Explain.

3. What action do you propose be taken against Obama. Impeach? But according to you that is what he is gunning for. So go for it and take my bet.

4. "This country is not only comprised of far right Demarcrats.". What does this sentence mean?, and I don't mean the misspelled word.

[whell]

Originally Posted by merrylander

Ever since smiling Roberts took over SCOTUS has been a bloody disaster.

If it weren't for Roberts, you wouldn't have health care reform contraceptive mandates to bitch about at all.

[whell]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Finn was a Clinton guy? Finn's a center right Eisenhower Republican, IIRC. You really are speaking through your rectum these days Mike.

I was never a G W Bush fan, but that didn't stop Finn from telling me that W was " my guy" in another thread.

[CarlV]

Originally Posted by icenine

Well that is just it....how can you prove or disprove practicing in good faith?
How can you prove what a religion is on not is? L. Ron Hubbard invented one right?

I was thinking maybe all the corporations may decide to go Christian Scientist. Scientists lol, you know the ones that will watch their children die of cancer because God wills it rather than seek the human help that this same God also gave us the ability to learn to save lives.

http://www.nytimes.com/1990/08/06/us...n-science.html


Praise the Lord! Hallelujah!


Carl