Cannot Impeach? Sue Obama?

[JJIII]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Can a rabid dog become more rabid?

Only in Washington.

[merrylander]

Adult in the caucus - Ha!

According to Webster's adult - a meaning one and dolt meaning a dull fellow so I guess with Bonehead they have it made.

[Pio1980]

Originally Posted by BeamOn

Proposed text for a post by negative five:

"It's only a matter of time before Pelosi, Reid and Obama shut down the internet in the name of controlling "free speech"

I cribbed it from here:
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-T...lawsuit-Threat

What? Blightfart, not Alex Jones? Mebbe Jerome Corsi can produce another bound bundle of asswipe for Alex on this.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

[Ike Bana]

Originally Posted by finnbow

It's funny how the GOP is now complaining about Obama issuing "signing statements" and then acting upon them after Dubya easily smashed the record for doing so. Dubya issued 161 signing statements affecting over 1,100 provisions of law in 160 Congressional enactments. In comparison, from his inauguration through April 18, 2014, President Obama has issued 27 signing statements affecting 97 specified provisions.

http://www.coherentbabble.com/faqs.htm

Bush generated more signing statements than all previous residents of the Oval Office, combined. The honor of the development of the concept of the Imperial Presidency is all Bush's (well OK, all Cheney's, since it was all Bush could accomplish to sit up and feed himself three times a day).

[Oerets]

I thought the Right were against Frivolous Lawsuits?




Barney

[4-2-7]

Originally Posted by BeamOn

I just read that the Congress can revoke a Presidential Executive Order by passing a bill by a veto proof majority. Good luck with that. So no wonder Ms. Pelosi said what she said. Childish behavior from certain mature adults.

You should go read that an executive order can just be tosed in the trash with the next President.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by 4-2-7

You should go read that an executive order can just be tosed in the trash with the next President.

Maybe that's what the GOP is pissed about. Due to demographics, they may not be able to elect a President in the foreseeable future.

[4-2-7]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Maybe that's what the GOP is pissed about. Due to demographics, they may not be able to elect a President in the foreseeable future.

You are living in a fantasy world if you think this country will vote in another Dem for President in 2016.

[bobabode]

What do you base that prediction on -5? Divining chicken entrails?

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by 4-2-7

You are living in a fantasy world if you think this country will vote in another Dem for President in 2016.

You're living in a fantasy world if you think today's GOP will appeal to blacks, Hispanics, gays, youth, women ... In politics, demographics is destiny.