Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 01-20-2010, 09:46 AM
cabinover cabinover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fair Haven, VT
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by HatchetJack View Post
Well that could be page #1

Why would medicare not want young Americans on board that almost never
get sick. If you want to lower premiums and have more money in medicare,
that would be a start. If people starting defecting, the ins. companies
would have to lower their rates.
I like it should it prove true and rates had to drop.
__________________
Wish I were out riding my bike.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 01-20-2010, 10:01 AM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by cabinover View Post
But they cannot have it both ways. If they simply want the pool of payers to increase then they should have passed this bill.
They can't have it both ways?????????????

They got rid of the single payee, they got rid of the public option. What makes you think they will not get ride of the pre existing condition inclusion clause as well?
They want it all. You know, the holy unbridled capitalism.
If this bill passes as currently is the celebration will be amongst the healthcare providers, not the reformers. In the mean time they want as much as they can get.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 01-20-2010, 10:02 AM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by HatchetJack View Post
Well that could be page #1

Why would medicare not want young Americans on board that almost never
get sick. If you want to lower premiums and have more money in medicare,
that would be a start. If people starting defecting, the ins. companies
would have to lower their rates.
that is why the public option is dead
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 01-20-2010, 10:11 AM
rickr15 rickr15 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylander View Post
Actually it was a former governor of Colorado who said that we old folks had a duty to die off before we bacame a burden.
Good old Dick Lamm.
__________________
The difference between intelligence and apathy?
I have no idea, and I couldn't care less.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 01-20-2010, 10:15 AM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
What, me worry?
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by noonereal View Post
They want it all. You know, the holy unbridled capitalism.
1000 pages of god-knows-what regulation is not unbridled capitalism and a large reason I suspect the bill is going down.

Why don't the principals get together, write something SIMPLE outlining their plan, and submit it directly to the people? Most folks know it can't keep going on this way, the cost is getting out of line.

Pete
__________________
"America is still a land of promise, especially during a political campaign."
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 01-20-2010, 10:23 AM
rickr15 rickr15 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by HatchetJack View Post
Well that could be page #1

Why would medicare not want young Americans on board that almost never
get sick. If you want to lower premiums and have more money in medicare,
that would be a start. If people starting defecting, the ins. companies
would have to lower their rates.
Medicare already has these young people. They have been taxing my check since I was 15. As a matter of fact they there is a Medicare deduction from every check I ever get.
__________________
The difference between intelligence and apathy?
I have no idea, and I couldn't care less.
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 01-20-2010, 10:31 AM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by HatchetJack View Post
Well that could be page #1

Why would medicare not want young Americans on board that almost never
get sick. If you want to lower premiums and have more money in medicare,
that would be a start. If people starting defecting, the ins. companies
would have to lower their rates.
Jack,

Please do not take this as an insult, but are you kidding? You are essentially talking about a public option, that very well could become a single payer plan. That is unless I completely misunderstand what you are saying. If I don't misunderstand, we have found something that we could agree on whole-heartedly. I would be absolutely ecstatic to see that proposal implemented.

I can see how you as a small business owner would find this beneficial. I expect that you would like to see your employees have health insurance coverage, but as a small business owner myself, I see what a huge chunk of our income goes into paying insurance premiums.

Regards,

D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 01-20-2010, 10:31 AM
Fast_Eddie's Avatar
Fast_Eddie Fast_Eddie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by HatchetJack View Post
Well that could be page #1

Why would medicare not want young Americans on board that almost never
get sick. If you want to lower premiums and have more money in medicare,
that would be a start. If people starting defecting, the ins. companies
would have to lower their rates.
That was one of the best ideas to die in this whole mess. Extending Medicare to people at age 50 was a real win/win. But the Republicans and even some Democrats blocked it under pressure from the Insurance Companies.

Make no mistake, there are winners in this fiasco. Insurance Companies are feeling pretty good this morning, I'd wager.
__________________
Two days slow. That's what they are.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 01-20-2010, 10:37 AM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
What, me worry?
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,227
Once again, how on earth did the GOP 'block' anything?

Pete
__________________
"America is still a land of promise, especially during a political campaign."
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 01-20-2010, 10:52 AM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete View Post
Once again, how on earth did the GOP 'block' anything?

Pete
They created a solid, impenetrable block of forty votes that only had to attract one opportunistic, soul-less political hack (read Joe Lieberman) to prevent a vote on a health care bill. Little over a year ago, it seems, Lieberman was trying to extend the GOP regime in the White House, so it seems pointless to not include him as a brick in the stonewall.

Regards,

D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.