Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-13-2012, 02:10 PM
barbara's Avatar
barbara barbara is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,237
It's all really very simple.
More guns = more death and injury from guns.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-13-2012, 02:44 PM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
What, me worry?
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,227
Boreas I thought of that!





Pete
__________________
"America is still a land of promise, especially during a political campaign."
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-13-2012, 02:55 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete View Post
Boreas I thought of that!
Yeah, that's one large individual consumer, there.

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-13-2012, 03:52 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,333
I'm just glad he and that one in Aurora didn't have the sense to use an AK47, those fuckers don't jam and the body count would be much higher. So much for American exceptionalism in manufacturing...

Besides all that, if you like guns and the second amendment protections I would think that y'all would want to clean up your own mess before us lefty liberals have to do it for you. You won't even be able to buy an airsoft rifle if my more radical brothers and sisters get involved in this. You'll be down in your basements making muzzle loading smoothbores if you want firearms.

Just a little polite advice because every time some dickwad gets his hands on a gun and decides they want to go out in a blaze of glory? You are that much closer to having all of those plastic, jam prone, POS M16's run through a recycling facility and that's only the tip of the camel's nose!

I'll repeat for clarities sake, clean it up before we have to because there's are a lot of people that don't want you to own guns at all. There are even some that wouldn't mind prying them out of your cold dead hands if that's what it takes. Grow the fuck up, be responsible gun owners and tell LaPierre to shut his trap.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-13-2012, 03:55 PM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by barbara View Post
It's all really very simple.
More guns = more death and injury from guns.
Guns don't kill people, people kill people.

It just so happens the more guns and ammo one can sneak into the mall the more one can kill.

I can't recall the last time someone took out over 70 people in under five minutes with a wiffle ball bat.

Regards,
Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-13-2012, 06:23 PM
Zeke's Avatar
Zeke Zeke is offline
Sir Lord Vader of Cheam
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lewiston, ID
Posts: 5,069
Send a message via Yahoo to Zeke
Here's what I don't get:

The defeatist stance on guns is that it makes no sense to control them because there are too many here already to effectively make a difference.

Gotcha.

But the same folks believe we can do something on immigration that doesn't include a form of amnesty?

If there's too many guns to for an administrative solution involving their removal, there are too many people...

It just shows how Republican radicalism is wack on both issues.
__________________
"American" means calling everyone who disagrees with you a traitor?
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12-13-2012, 06:31 PM
barbara's Avatar
barbara barbara is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeke View Post
Here's what I don't get:

The defeatist stance on guns is that it makes no sense to control them because there are too many here already to effectively make a difference.

Gotcha.

But the same folks believe we can do something on immigration that doesn't include a form of amnesty?

If there's too many guns to for an administrative solution involving their removal, there are too many people...

It just shows how Republican radicalism is wack on both issues.
Gee, Zeke, what's so hard to understand..... Republican radicals just want what they want regardless of how illogical the reasoning is.
Besides, if we took away their guns, how would they ever deal with illegal immigrants? We all know the only solution is to kill them as they cross the border.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12-13-2012, 06:39 PM
mpholland's Avatar
mpholland mpholland is offline
reflexionar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 2,273
Makes sense to me I guess. If making guns illegal will get guns off the streets and away from criminals maybe we ought to make cocaine, heroin, and meth illegal too!
__________________
“Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.” Douglas Adams
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-13-2012, 06:40 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeke View Post
Here's what I don't get:

The defeatist stance on guns is that it makes no sense to control them because there are too many here already to effectively make a difference.

Gotcha.

But the same folks believe we can do something on immigration that doesn't include a form of amnesty?

If there's too many guns to for an administrative solution involving their removal, there are too many people...

It just shows how Republican radicalism is wack on both issues.
Don't forget these are the same people who think they need their own AK47 so that they and their buddies can get Red Dawn on the US Army's ass when ZOG takes over.

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-13-2012, 08:28 PM
Oerets's Avatar
Oerets Oerets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Derby City U.S.A.
Posts: 8,936
All that is needed to defend ones home is a shotgun. Assault weapons and high capacity magazines are just toys for big boys who want to have fun. Rationalize the need to have them with reasons only they believe to be true.


Why is it a sin to want control over a lethal weapon that causes so much damage? Even something like requiring a license or registration is seen as an infringement on ones Rights. How so do we not strive to limit weapons mainly nuclear and chemical for being developed by other countries. If the gun debate were to be an honest one then why not allow every country to have any weapon they feel the need for? This would make the world a safer place right?




Barney
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.