Benghazi attack - Terrorists or unruly crowd?

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by Twodogs

I've told you a dozen times that I can't stand, nor do I watch Hannity. What part of that are you struggling with?

I see this response as a complete evasion. You don't have to watch Hannity to get suck up the Fox Snooze bullshit. Do you watch Fox News? What other sources do you take in?

John

[whell]

Originally Posted by Twodogs

I've told you a dozen times that I can't stand, nor do I watch Hannity. What part of that are you struggling with?

His own bias. You see, your actions, thoughts and views of the world need to fit into a template (particularly if you lean to the right), and when you don't you really cause some folks around here a lot of problems.

[JBS...]

Originally Posted by d-ray657

Since you apparently decided not to read the thread, TD, I'll repeat:

"What do eyewitnesses say about the events in Benghazi? Were they related to the insulting video, or is that a red herring? And was the assault planned for the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, or was it spontaneous?

According to reporting by David D. Kirkpatrick and Suliman Ali Zway of The New York Times, eyewitnesses have said there was no peaceful demonstration against the video outside the compound before the attack, though a crowd of Benghazi residents soon gathered, and some later looted the compound. But the attackers, recognized as members of a local militant group called Ansar al-Shariah, did tell bystanders that they were attacking the compound because they were angry about the video. They did not mention the Sept. 11 anniversary. Intelligence officials believe that planning for the attack probably began only a few hours before it took place."
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/18/us...zi-attack.html

If someone said that Obama raped a white woman, you'd believe it because you want to believe it.

That is unless she got pregnant. Then it wasn't legitimate rape.

You really should know how silly you look by always pointig to this BS story from the NY Times....

Obama has blood on his hands... Why did he leave our people to die?

or did he just simply sleep trough it all...?

Resting up for the fundraiser I bet.

What a Fn loser this guy is.

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by JBS...

You really should know how silly you look by always pointig to this BS story from the NY Times....

Why, exactly, is this story "BS"?

A word of caution: your opinion doesn't count. You'll need to provide sourced factual information to refute any point in the NYT article. Otherwise, you'll come across as just another Wingnut blow-hard. And we all know that's not true.


John

[Charles]

Originally Posted by d-ray657

Since you apparently decided not to read the thread, TD, I'll repeat:

"What do eyewitnesses say about the events in Benghazi? Were they related to the insulting video, or is that a red herring? And was the assault planned for the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, or was it spontaneous?

According to reporting by David D. Kirkpatrick and Suliman Ali Zway of The New York Times, eyewitnesses have said there was no peaceful demonstration against the video outside the compound before the attack, though a crowd of Benghazi residents soon gathered, and some later looted the compound. But the attackers, recognized as members of a local militant group called Ansar al-Shariah, did tell bystanders that they were attacking the compound because they were angry about the video. They did not mention the Sept. 11 anniversary. Intelligence officials believe that planning for the attack probably began only a few hours before it took place."
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/18/us...zi-attack.html

If someone said that Obama raped a white woman, you'd believe it because you want to believe it.

That is unless she got pregnant. Then it wasn't legitimate rape.

I thought Obama preferred men.

Chas

[JBS...]

Originally Posted by Boreas

Why, exactly, is this story "BS"?

A word of caution: your opinion doesn't count. You'll need to provide sourced factual information to refute any point in the NYT article. Otherwise, you'll come across as just another Wingnut blow-hard. And we all know that's not true.


John

"Sourced factual information" like your article with unnamed sources... "bystanders ", "eyewitnesses", "residents" or maybe it was the residents that looted the compound... Give me a break.

Personaly I dont care how it started, our more to the point, what you think.

The question is what was he doing...?

Sitting there watching in real time or men DIE our was he Sleeping...?

[merrylander]

I don't recall all this blather when St. Ronnie lost all hose marines in Lebanon in 1983.

[JBS...]

Originally Posted by merrylander

I don't recall all this blather when St. Ronnie lost all hose marines in Lebanon in 1983.

That lasted all but two minutes...

The Benghazi attack lasted seven hours and the last two that died was after 6 hours while calling for help the whole time...

State side; they were watching it real time through a drone and didn't do a damn thing...

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by JBS...

Personaly I dont care how it started, our more to the point, what you think.

That makes two of us. I don't care what I think either. I only care what I feel.

In my little lizard brain.

The question is what was he doing...?

Sitting there watching in real time or men DIE our was he Sleeping...?

Or was he getting a blowjob from an interne while he watched?

Or maybe he was bogarting the White House crack pipe?

Questions, questions, questions! What's a poor teabagger to do?

John

[merrylander]

Originally Posted by JBS...

That lasted all but two minutes...

The Benghazi attack lasted seven hours and the last two that died was after 6 hours while calling for help the whole time...

State side; they were watching it real time through a drone and didn't do a damn thing...

Oh stick a sock in it, Ronnie knew damn well they should not have been there, whether they were killed in two minutes or two hours - they were still dead. Your feigned outrage is as transparent as a pane of glass.