|
|
|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|

10-25-2012, 03:06 PM
|
 |
Resident octogenarian
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBS...
ummm, I think it's called oral sex... 
|
Actually it is called fellatio, and I doubt it involves "blowing".
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
|

10-25-2012, 03:10 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylander
Actually it is called fellatio, and I doubt it involves "blowing". 
|
But you don't know?
John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
|

10-25-2012, 03:17 PM
|
 |
What, me worry?
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,227
|
|
PoliticalChat.Org - expanding horizons.
Pete
__________________
"America is still a land of promise, especially during a political campaign."
|

10-25-2012, 03:25 PM
|
 |
Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,330
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mezz
Obama, in numerous appearances, as well as members of his admin were clearly and without nuance stating for roughly two weeks after Sept 11, 2012 that this was a spontaneous attack and there was no mention of terrorism. Now evidence is showing that the admin and the president basically sat and watched events on the ground unfold and seem to have failed to act to protect US embassy staff. Four American's are dead and this president needs to accept responsibility instead of continuing to engage in lies and cover-ups over this.
|
Read the fecking transcript, moron. There have been no lies and no cover up. Stop believing everything you read on that miserable sumbitch Breitbart's website or your only other source, Drudge. How you maintain to hold on to these clear fabrications is a mystery, Mezz. Obviously you know your way, somewhat, around the internet. So why you don't bother to investigate this just shows that you can't be bothered. The same way that you couldn't be bothered to answer one simple question put to you, you blatantly plagerized someone else's words without the barest of attribution.
What you've mistaken for bile being sent your way is actually scorn, mezz. That you keep coming back for more of this well deserved scorn is a sign that you don't have the slightest respect for anyone on this forum. Deservedly, no one has the least bit of respect for you. Have you noticed that not one of the conservative members here has ever rushed to your defense? That is a clear and unambiguous message, Mezz, that you refuse to see. I don't enjoy berating you and if you had acknowledged your plagerizing and apologized and/or at least corrected it, this would all be quite the different conversation.
In closing Mezz, you have proven to be a feckless and dishonest member here deserving of scorn. If I had my druthers, you would have been banned outright for plagerizing but that decision isn't mine to make and complaining about moderation publically is against the rules. Thus that is all I will say on this matter. It is my opinion that you are despicable and dishonest. At this late date, there is nothing you can do or say to change that opinion. Regards, Bob
|

10-25-2012, 03:39 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,252
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mezz
Obama, in numerous appearances, as well as members of his admin were clearly and without nuance stating for roughly two weeks after Sept 11, 2012 that this was a spontaneous attack and there was no mention of terrorism. Now evidence is showing that the admin and the president basically sat and watched events on the ground unfold and seem to have failed to act to protect US embassy staff. Four American's are dead and this president needs to accept responsibility instead of continuing to engage in lies and cover-ups over this.
|
Once again you gloss over facts. Obama was relaying what was in his PDB's. There is no new evidence. I will let former Secretary of State Condi Rice set the record straight. Lord knows she presided over twelve embassy attacks, and many attacks targeting foreign service workers, during the Bush administration. If Bengahzi is a sign of American weakness then we were really weak under Bush. She effectively neuters Behngazigate. Surely you trust Condi Rice's information.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...v=2k_LMTNLZXc#!
Probably not the answers Greta expected. Condi did the honorable thing and told the truth. A Very rare moment on Fox News.
The e-mails are not classified and are handed out to hundreds of people. It is not uncommon for many terrorist groups to claim responsibility for the same attack. That is why you cannot jump to conclusions until all the facts are in and digested.
The administration is not hiding anything and I still think Romney is pond scum for politicizing for American deaths.
|

10-25-2012, 03:42 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wgrr
Once again, it is now a know fact, that the CIA was feeding the President information that it was an angry mob that attacked the consulate and killed four American foreign service workers.
|
That's all they told Obama, huh? If that's true, then there's a major scandal of miscommunication or non-communication between the intelligence community and the White House.
- Under Secretary of State for Management Patrick F. Kennedy, who had direct oversight for the staff in Benghazi, called it a terrorist attack on Sept 12.
- Matt Olsen, head of the National Counterterrorism Center, testified on Sept. 19 that it was a “terrorist attack.”
- Jay Carney, September 20, said that it is self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack.
- Hillary Clinton on September 21 called when happened in Benghazi a terrorist attack.
- Obama's speech to the UN on 9/25/12, where he blames the video (again) for what happened in Benghazi.
- September 27 - Leon Panetta says that Benghazi was a terrorist attack.
Looks like the State Dept and Intelligence folks called it a terrorist attack pretty consistently from the get-go. It looks like it was Obama who continued to insist on blaming the video. Why?
|

10-25-2012, 03:46 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,252
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylander
Actually it is called fellatio, and I doubt it involves "blowing". 
|
You are a scholar and a gentleman. Oral sex can indeed be cunnilingus also.
Suck, dammit, don't blow, blowing is just an expression of speech.
|

10-25-2012, 03:53 PM
|
 |
Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,330
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete
PoliticalChat.Org - expanding horizons.
Pete
|
Lemon Haze or Purple Kush? 
|

10-25-2012, 04:09 PM
|
 |
Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,330
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
That's all they told Obama, huh? If that's true, then there's a major scandal of miscommunication or non-communication between the intelligence community and the White House.
- Under Secretary of State for Management Patrick F. Kennedy, who had direct oversight for the staff in Benghazi, called it a terrorist attack on Sept 12.
- Matt Olsen, head of the National Counterterrorism Center, testified on Sept. 19 that it was a “terrorist attack.”
- Jay Carney, September 20, said that it is self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack.
- Hillary Clinton on September 21 called when happened in Benghazi a terrorist attack.
- Obama's speech to the UN on 9/25/12, where he blames the video (again) for what happened in Benghazi.
- September 27 - Leon Panetta says that Benghazi was a terrorist attack.
Looks like the State Dept and Intelligence folks called it a terrorist attack pretty consistently from the get-go. It looks like it was Obama who continued to insist on blaming the video. Why?
|
C'mon Whell. The president is correct in assuming that the video in question fomented this latest unrest. There was a neighbor to the Ansar-al-Sharia group that was quoted as saying he had heard from their members that they were upset about the video. Egyptian TV had been broadcasting and re-broadcasting the video for a week before the shit hit the fan. That is why a staffer tweeted that message in Cairo the morning before the demonstration. I'll make an assumption here that Benghazi is within the area of service of Egyptian TV and even if they are not that TV station can be viewed online.
To me, all of this conspiracy theorist's bullcrap is simply to provide cover for your candidate's terrible judgement in politicizing an attack on our Ambassador and his staff before the barest of facts were in, not too mention buried and mourned. Romney against all advice chose this course and his surrogates have been bleating this bullshit conspiracy theory to deflect criticism.
|

10-25-2012, 04:22 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,252
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
That's all they told Obama, huh? If that's true, then there's a major scandal of miscommunication or non-communication between the intelligence community and the White House.
- Under Secretary of State for Management Patrick F. Kennedy, who had direct oversight for the staff in Benghazi, called it a terrorist attack on Sept 12.
- Matt Olsen, head of the National Counterterrorism Center, testified on Sept. 19 that it was a “terrorist attack.”
- Jay Carney, September 20, said that it is self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack.
- Hillary Clinton on September 21 called when happened in Benghazi a terrorist attack.
- Obama's speech to the UN on 9/25/12, where he blames the video (again) for what happened in Benghazi.
- September 27 - Leon Panetta says that Benghazi was a terrorist attack.
Looks like the State Dept and Intelligence folks called it a terrorist attack pretty consistently from the get-go. It looks like it was Obama who continued to insist on blaming the video. Why?
|
Obama called it a terrorist attack the day after. As I said before no matter what the motivation was they are all terrorist attacks. Also, there is no proof the video did not cause the attack. I don't give a damn who said what..when. You obviously did not watch the video.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:51 PM.
|