Why?

[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Even if I were to stipulate that Dubya didn't concoct rationale for the war (I won't ), then he went to war on misread intel, as you assert. Isn't he still responsible for taking the country to war (the most serious act a sovereign nation undertake) and it costs and consequences?

Of course. Never said otherwise. It's just a much more likely scenario than all the half baked nonsense that the left likes to spew about the Iraq war.