[QUOTE=bobabode;111706]Now that you've mentioned it the network in my area (Time Warner) was promised to the public as an infrastructure improvement The deal allowed these companies exclusive useage for a period of time to recoup their investment in cabling, switching - etc. I hope that answers your question about where I get my outlandish ideas about who is in charge of the "networks."

CableTV was being sold that way in Maryland too IIRC. It was seven or so years out here then it was leased out to the highest bidder.
QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
It's becoming less relevant all the time. Spectrum is not required with cable, except to the extent that they rebroadcast the local channels - and I believe they pay a fee to do so. Otherwise they own the cable lines and network hubs and facilities for transmission of the signal, and pay for the content that they deliver.
|
So my memory is faulty is what you are saying?