|
|
|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|

06-09-2012, 01:32 PM
|
 |
Jigsawed
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,195
|
|
|
These are tough times, but we are well served by this very egalitarian arm force.
|

06-09-2012, 01:42 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dondilion
These are tough times, but we are well served by this very egalitarian arm force.
|
This word "egalitarian" you are using. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Our army is far from egalitarian, either in terms of its demographics or it heirarchical structure. The ranks are comprised of the "lower orders"of our society - becoming even more so because of the lowered standards for enlistment - and the governing "RHIP" philosophy makes the military a very stratified culture.
John
|

06-09-2012, 01:50 PM
|
 |
Reformed Know-Nothing
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,554
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas
This word "egalitarian" you are using. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Our army is far from egalitarian, either in terms of its demographics or it heirarchical structure. The ranks are comprised of the "lower orders"of our society - becoming even more so because of the lowered standards for enlistment - and the governing "RHIP" philosophy makes the military a very stratified culture.
John
|
While what you say is certainly true, the Army is more merit-based than most any other public (or private institution). In that sense, it is egalitarian (i.e., an enlisted man or officer's chances of career progression is based more on merit than class or clan.) That said, the social classes from which the officers corps and enlisted men come is certainly very different.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
|

06-09-2012, 02:06 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
While what you say is certainly true, the Army is more merit-based than most any other public (or private institution). In that sense, it is egalitarian (i.e., an enlisted man or officer's chances of career progression is based more on merit than class or clan.) That said, the social classes from which the officers corps and enlisted men come is certainly very different.
|
My experience in the military, brief though it was, tells me that what you say is largely true in the enlisted ranks but that an officer's career is very much determined by "class and clan". I''ts all about graduation, and class ranking, from one of the service academies and whether your father, grandfather or great, great, great grandfather served and what rank they attained.
John
|

06-09-2012, 02:50 PM
|
 |
Jigsawed
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,195
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas
My experience in the military, brief though it was, tells me that what you say is largely true in the enlisted ranks but that an officer's career is very much determined by "class and clan". I''ts all about graduation, and class ranking, from one of the service academies and whether your father, grandfather or great, great, great grandfather served and what rank they attained.
John
|
OK! Thanks for distilling! I am now able to put your opinions in perspective.
Here is a black officer who graduated from a service academy.(Saw him on C Span)
A distinguish record, but the fact that he is a West Pointer probably enhanced his
promotional climb.
http://www.army.mil/africanamericans...es/austin.html
|

06-09-2012, 02:55 PM
|
 |
Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,333
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dondilion
I believe you underrate this great nation. After 9/11 a lot of privileged americans answered the call, voluntered.
|
I believe that you didn't read what I wrote. No matter.
|

06-09-2012, 05:06 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dondilion
OK! Thanks for distilling! I am now able to put your opinions in perspective.
Here is a black officer who graduated from a service academy.(Saw him on C Span)
A distinguish record, but the fact that he is a West Pointer probably enhanced his
promotional climb.
http://www.army.mil/africanamericans...es/austin.html
|
So, your point is..... what? He's black?
John
|

06-09-2012, 05:24 PM
|
 |
Jigsawed
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,195
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas
So, your point is..... what? He's black?
John
|
Dispite being black has fulfilled important class requirements as per your observations.
|

06-09-2012, 05:32 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dondilion
Dispite being black has fulfilled important class requirements as per your observations.
|
So, that was your point. Boy, oh boy!
John
Last edited by Boreas; 06-09-2012 at 06:04 PM.
|

06-09-2012, 05:56 PM
|
 |
Loyal Opposition
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
|
|
|
I think it is fair to say that whether it is in the military or in society, we do have aspects of a class system. Those born into prosperity are more likely to have the tools (and connections) to attain future prosperity. The barriers of economic classes are clearly not impermeable. Perhaps they are not even barriers, but there are obstacles that are cleared away for some and stacked up against others.
Regards,
D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 PM.
|