|
|
|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|

05-24-2012, 02:12 AM
|
 |
Area Man
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,451
|
|
Flippity, floppity, like Carp in the boat bottom;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQwrB...eature=related
Ladies and Gentlemen I present you with the most COLOSSAL liar on the planet.
What a TOTAL P-O-S!
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
|

05-24-2012, 08:01 AM
|
 |
What, me worry?
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,227
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles
......
Unlike Obama, who continues to do it, in spades, for all of the right reasons.
Chas
|
LMAO!!!
Pete
__________________
"America is still a land of promise, especially during a political campaign."
|

05-25-2012, 10:12 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 346
|
|
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obam...early-60-years
Certainly he aint lying. The most conservative prez ever! why is there no blanche smilie?
I cant stand the guys' state of the union address, nor hearing him talk on tv. Every thing he says is a lie.
|

05-25-2012, 10:36 PM
|
 |
Loyal Opposition
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by budgetaudio6
|
From the article you cite:
"Assuming this White House estimate proves correct, Obama will have cut spending as a percentage of GDP by 7.5 percent in the four fiscal years that started during his term. That would put him ahead of Reagan in terms of how much he would have cut federal spending measured as percentage of GDP."
In other words, it ain't a lie.
Regards,
D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
|

05-25-2012, 11:01 PM
|
 |
Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,330
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhunter
"The fact that we are here today to debate raising America 's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the US Government cannot pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government's reckless fiscal policies. Increasing America's debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that, "the buck stops here.' Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better."
~ Senator Barack H. Obama, March 2006
|
It doesn't look like the whole speech by any stretch. It's a popular tactic to lob off most of someone's stated position and run with it as a factoid to bolster their viewpoint. Or have you located those dratted Iraqi WMDs that cost so much coin and soldiers lives which have so far eluded everyone.
|

05-25-2012, 11:07 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 346
|
|
assumeing makes an ass out of me and you, and them as well  Where can we find uncut videos of the politicians speaches without them being cut? Inquiring minds want to know? I wont sit through speech by obama. Insulting to say the least.
This isnt about party lines. Its just that i cant stand people who lie all the time. Now im not so certain romney will be better.
But at least he isnt a commie minded candidate...or will he be...not certain of that either considering his many flipflops.
|

05-25-2012, 11:14 PM
|
 |
Loyal Opposition
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by budgetaudio6
assumeing makes an ass out of me and you, and them as well  Where can we find uncut videos of the politicians speaches without them being cut? Inquiring minds want to know? I wont sit through speech by obama. Insulting to say the least.
This isnt about party lines. Its just that i cant stand people who lie all the time. Now im not so certain romney will be better.
But at least he isnt a commie minded candidate...or will he be...not certain of that either considering his many flipflops.
|
You might want to identify some specific policies of Obama's that you consider to be "commie." Please identify what portions of those policies follow Marxist ideals.
Regards,
D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
|

05-26-2012, 12:15 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 346
|
|
|
Obama care is a good starter. So marxi*m at its finest? After that it invades your entire life. Pretty soon we have china in america...no gold, but we have plenty of land. Wont they need DC first. Good riddance. But bad for america. As by then we will be listening to chinese propaganda in English.
china beacause the govmint cant pay his billls
|

05-26-2012, 01:45 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Diego California
Posts: 3,272
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657
From the article you cite:
"Assuming this White House estimate proves correct, Obama will have cut spending as a percentage of GDP by 7.5 percent in the four fiscal years that started during his term. That would put him ahead of Reagan in terms of how much he would have cut federal spending measured as percentage of GDP."
In other words, it ain't a lie.
Regards,
D-Ray
|
Didn't that narrative originate from the demonstrative flawed Rex Nutting article?
Quote:
It started with the ridiculous column by one Rex Nutting that I dismantled last night. Nutting claims that the “Obama spending binge never happened.” He says Obama has presided over the slowest growth in federal spending in modern history. Nutting achieves this counter-intuitive feat by simply omitting the first year of the Obama administration, FY 2009, when federal spending jumped $535 billion, a massive increase that has been sustained and built upon in the succeeding years. Nutting blithely attributes this FY 2009 spending to President Bush, even though 1) Obama was president for more than two-thirds of FY 2009; 2) the Democratic Congress never submitted a budget to President Bush for FY 2009, instead waiting until after Obama was inaugurated; 3) Obama signed the FY 2009 budget in March of that year; 4) Obama and the Democratic Congress spent more than $400 billion more in FY 2009 than Bush had requested in his budget proposal, which was submitted in early 2008; and 5) the stimulus bill, which ballooned FY 2009 spending, was, as we all know, enacted by the Democratic Congress and signed into law by President Obama. So for Nutting to use FY 2010 as the first year of the Obama administration for fiscal purposes was absurd.
http://politifactbias.blogspot.com/
|
__________________
Dear Optimist: Unless life gives you water and sugar too, your lemonade will suck.
Last edited by bhunter; 05-26-2012 at 01:47 AM.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 AM.
|