Abortion Duel

[ZeroJunk]

Originally Posted by Rajoo

Since Roe vs Wade we had consensus about abortions until the Catholic Supreme Court decided to upend Roe vs Wade and leave it up to the states. Why now must a single Federal judge decide for the whole country? Or for a Forced Birthers court of appeals partially side with this judge, again deciding for the whole country when its now up to the states?

My issue is not just with abortion but activist judges not leaving this up to the states. And we know this is to prevent women from states which ban abortions seeking abortions in other states.

It was a can of worms from the beginning. Even Ginsberg said it was"bad law" . Not that it was a bad idea to give women the choice, just that it was not in the Constitution.

The whole idea of activist judges is something new to me, or maybe I just missed it. They do not make law being the intention I presumed. Just interpret what the legislative branch decides.

Seems like at this point in history the legislative branch does not have the balls to make a decision on much of anything.