Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 05-19-2023, 10:53 AM
whell whell is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ike Bana View Post
1. Sorry but: What a stupid fucking comment. We knew from the beginning that Mueller complied with DOJ policies, when he took the assignment...and that there would be no recommendstion for a DOJ indictment. But you say he could have? I suppose he could have, he could have also fucked your grandmother.

2. You said he was "trolling Hillary". You saw it as a fucking joke. If you're not gonna stand behind the things you say...you’re a useless plonker.

At the very least, screwing someone else could be considered progress over your usual pastime of screwing yourself.

As far as what Mueller said:

In early May, Attorney General William Barr testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee that Mueller "reiterated several times in a group meeting that he was not saying that but for the OLC opinion, he would have found obstruction."

Earlier, during the Judiciary hearing, Republican Rep. Ken Buck of Colorado also asked Mueller about charging Trump.

Mueller says a president can be charged with obstruction after leaving office

"Was there sufficient evidence to convict President Trump or anyone else with obstruction of justice?" Buck asked.

"We did not make that calculation," Mueller said, citing the OLC opinion.

Buck later asked, "Could you charge a president with a crime after he left office?"

"Yes," Mueller replied.

"You believe that he committed — you could charge the President of the United States with obstruction of justice after he left office?" Buck continued.

"Yes," Mueller answered.


What did the media think about this exchange?

"OMG Buck just walked RIGHT into it. He seriously just gave the Democrats the clip they want. He just gave Mueller a clear and concise moment to say the only reason Trump wasn't indicted is because DOJ policy prohibited it," tweeted national security lawyer Bradley Moss.

Which, of course, is bullshit. Because here we are 3 plus years later and there has been no effort to bring any criminal charges against Trump for the items reviewed by Mueller. But, you guys did get your talking point, lame is the passage of time has rendered it.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.