|
This is hilarious. A couple of years ago the left was bleating about the evils of the 1% and how they were screwing up the world and stacking the deck against the 99%. Now that it turns out that the left comprises a hefty portion of the 1%, the leftists in this forum extoll the virtues of the 1% by suggesting that the 1% are charitable.
So which is it: is it a good idea that the 1% have most of the loot because they're virtuous and they donate their loot to charity? Or is it a bad idea that all that wealth is concentrated within 1% of the population, and the folks who have it are still a threat to the 99% who they're stealing the loot from regardless of their political leanings?
|