Why is it.................

[piece-itpete]

Originally Posted by d-ray657

Pete, you're gonna get stripped of your pocket protector.

Regards,

D-ray

Anything but that!!

Originally Posted by merrylander

Yeah Pete, you really need to take off those blue glasses, makes you think everyone is a liberal.

I've got issues with Buchanan caving to the left.

Originally Posted by Boreas

Thanks, I'll see if I can make any sense of this.

I should have said this before but I was just waking up. Simply put, having wealth isn't the same as serving wealth. Nobody could claim that the Kennedys and the Roosevelts ever served the wealthy or ignored the interests of the poor and disenfranchised. Conversely, nobody could honestly deny that Reagan did just that.

John

Nice spin Hedging? Or does being Dem mean you don't look out for what's yours?

Originally Posted by Boreas

Shit! My brain doesn't go that high!

Now I'm amazed for the opposite reasons. I mean, I knew that the Congress was a "millionaires' club" but I had no idea of the extent to which that was true. Alcee Hastings is the "poorest" at around a half a mil.

John

Shocking, ain't it? :yes:

Pete