Quote:
Originally Posted by Dondilion
The political importance/heft of states with a relatively small population is an intent, an understanding by the framers of the polity based upon the fear of the power of the majority.
No amount of fulmination can deny that.
|
The small states are massively over represented in the government of this country. Do you realize that it's possible for a candidate to win the Electoral College vote with 270 with 21% of the popular vote. There's only one reason...the small states are massively over represented.
From Brookings in 2022...
The challenge to democracy - overcoming the small state bias
The population of California is larger than the combined population of the smallest 21 states. The 39 million residents of those 21 states are represented by 42 votes in the Senate. The 39 million residents of California are represented by 2 votes in the Senate. So go ahead, tell me how the 39 million residents of those 21 states are not massively over represented in the government of this country, and the 39 million residents of California are not under represented.
And the suggestion that the founders had the protection of smaller states in mind in 1776 is idiotic. At the founding Virginia, Massachusetts, NY, N. Carolina were bigger than the others but not so much bigger that there were legitimate concerns regarding under and over representation. That may have changed by the time of the 1800 census, but at the time the Constitution was written and ratified there were no states with 20 or 30 or more times the population of any other states.