Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-20-2016, 09:11 AM
JCricket's Avatar
JCricket JCricket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: colorado
Posts: 1,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Joad View Post
I totally disgusted with this whole process. This entire election season has been one insult after another to my sense of fair play.

The entire thing has been rotten and rigged.

First the Democrats rigged the primary process for Hillary. Right off the bat they assign her a 400 point lead in undemocratic superdelegates, setting the narrative in the minds of the voters that she has an insurmountable lead that can't be overcome. Then the media colludes with them by reporting that "insurmountable" lead before every primary.

Then, after she "wins" the nomination, the media pivots and goes on a non stop rampage to destroy Donald Trump.

Finally I guess karma catches up and she's tripped up by the grossly unfair electoral college. Make no mistake, I'm happy she's not going to be President, but I abhor the way it came about.
Hey Tom,
Where did you get the info on the 400 point lead? I googled and didn't find anything conclusive. I would like to know more about this.
__________________
Instead of a debate, how about a discussion? I want to learn, I don't care about winning.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-20-2016, 09:14 AM
Denier Denier is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Heaven
Posts: 120
I'm glad Trump won and I'm glad it hurts the sociopathic criminal left.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-20-2016, 09:18 AM
68custom's Avatar
68custom 68custom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 846
getting rid of the college of electors will be a huge undertaking starting with every state before going to congress and yes it should be done. I think campaign finacing laws should be changed as well there is too much money in the process now. 501c's and superpacs have way too much influence on outcomes.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-20-2016, 10:09 AM
whell whell is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by 68custom View Post
getting rid of the college of electors will be a huge undertaking starting with every state before going to congress and yes it should be done. I think campaign finacing laws should be changed as well there is too much money in the process now. 501c's and superpacs have way too much influence on outcomes.
Uh huh. If the situation were reversed and a Dem lost the popular vote but won the electoral vote, the EC would be talked about as the greatest idea ever.

The US is not a democracy. It is a representative republic. The EC was devised to be consistent with idea of a representative republic. The left doesn't get to kick that to the curb just because they lost one election.

I agree with you on the campaign financing laws. Get rid of tax favored status for PAC's and the favored tax treatment of political contributions. That would certainly be a good start.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-20-2016, 10:32 AM
nailer's Avatar
nailer nailer is offline
Rational Anarchist
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Uh huh. If the situation were reversed and a Dem lost the popular vote but won the electoral vote, the EC would be talked about as the greatest idea ever.

The US is not a democracy. It is a representative republic. The EC was devised to be consistent with idea of a representative republic. The left doesn't get to kick that to the curb just because they lost one election.

I agree with you on the campaign financing laws. Get rid of tax favored status for PAC's and the favored tax treatment of political contributions. That would certainly be a good start.
Regardless of who's in power and who won, the Electoral College needs to go and the Senate needs to be proportion by population, the least populated states getting one ...

Regarding our being a republic of sovereign states, that was then and this is now. The Civil War set a precedent regarding holy state sovereignty.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-20-2016, 10:32 AM
Rajoo's Avatar
Rajoo Rajoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Sierras
Posts: 15,279
Is it the EC or the two party system that is stifling democracy?
__________________
The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite. Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-20-2016, 10:37 AM
ZeroJunk ZeroJunk is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,919
It would be hard to reconcile how a candidate could lose 95% of the counties in the country but win the popular vote and be president.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-20-2016, 10:38 AM
nailer's Avatar
nailer nailer is offline
Rational Anarchist
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rajoo View Post
Is it the EC or the two party system that is stifling democracy?
Both. TJ showed the main problem with the EC with his CA/WY example and the parties are corporately run (American Fascism).
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-20-2016, 10:51 AM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Uh huh. If the situation were reversed and a Dem lost the popular vote but won the electoral vote, the EC would be talked about as the greatest idea ever.

The US is not a democracy. It is a representative republic. The EC was devised to be consistent with idea of a representative republic. The left doesn't get to kick that to the curb just because they lost one election.

I agree with you on the campaign financing laws. Get rid of tax favored status for PAC's and the favored tax treatment of political contributions. That would certainly be a good start.
See, that's the difference between you and most everyone else. We think in terms of what constitutes the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Your Randian obsession with the individual and of selfishness as a cardinal virtue is a deranged perversion of enlightened self interest. See a shrink.
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-20-2016, 11:04 AM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroJunk View Post
It would be hard to reconcile how a candidate could lose 95% of the counties in the country but win the popular vote and be president.
Land doesn't vote, citizens vote.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.