Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
OK, fine and dandy. But you didn't specify that you were including "collateral damage" caused by narcotics use in your definition.
Where the f**k did I suggest it? I didn't even mention you in the response to your post. Misread or misconstrue post is what lefty shitstacks do, I guess.
Not likely. We tried that already, less the mandatory surrender of property that you advocate above. And the research on the impact of the law indicated nothing even close to the reduction in homicide rates that you envision above.
The mandatory surrender of property would require an amendment to that document your claim to despise, the US Constitution. Currently, that horrid document prevents the government from confiscating or compelling the surrender of personal property without due process. Some of the other "first world nations" don't always have the same protections for personal property as this country does, as distressing as that may be to you.
All I have now is a headache after reading your rant. |
That's because your head was up your butt while I was kicking your ass. Every one of your bullshit comments got a head on deadly reply from me, you pathetic genuflecting cult member.