[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Me burying my head in the sand??? I guess you don't do irony. A recap on your positions on the Russia issue over time - you first called any Russian involvement in the election fake news.

It was, and it still is. Comey again stated that there's no evidence that any of the voting was compromised. When asked specifically, he also stated that there's no way to assess the impact of any Russian propaganda efforts. Couple that with the fact that Ms Clinton still won the popular vote, and that Russian's didn't target any down-ballot races in their "efforts", yet Republicans still won those handily, and any objective assessment of the facts leads to the inescapable conclusion that the "Russian thing" is not much more then a bunch of lefty hyperventilation.

So, slow down and catch your breath, Finn.

Originally Posted by finnbow

Secondly, you called the intelligence community's finding that Russia favored Trump fake news (both claims now enjoy support by everyone but you and your Trumpenfuhrer).

No one's disputing content, but there's plenty of room to dispute effectiveness and results.

Originally Posted by finnbow

Now, you claim that no Trump minions were involved while at the same time, Sean Spicer is active throwing Manafort and Flynn under the bus.There's a strong likelihood that you'll be proven wrong once again. The FBI doesn't relish investigating a sitting President, but in Comey's own words, he's forced to so because of probable cause of crime or the involvement of foreign agents.

OK, then show me the evidence of collusion. Where is it - other than a bought and paid for dossier including rich info about - among other things - prostitutes peeing on bed sheets - which no one except the left wants to believe. Show me all of the evidence of deep, dark meetings between Trump or his team and those Pesky Ruskies plotting to screw poor Hillary.

Originally Posted by finnbow

FWIW, Clapper clarified the other day that his statement meant that he had no conclusive evidence on the day he left office, January 20. He hasn't been in the loop since January 20. Comey statement Monday seems to indicate that further information is coming in since January 20.

When asked the question directly - Does evidence exist TODAY - his response was "Not that I'm aware of." So, that "truth is optional" sack of crap try to "clarify" what day he was lying and which day he wasn't, but it makes little difference.

Originally Posted by finnbow

We'll see, won't we? Your denials aren't going to help your Trumpenfuhrer. All they do is show your own gullibility and loyalty to him. Stay tuned and see whether John McCain is correct about more shoes dropping on this story. I'm betting there will be more news as opposed to an immediate throwing-in of the towel, notwithstanding Devin Nunes efforts to undermine the inquiry.

Right, because pretty much all you have is your "We'll see", which translates into "Please, please, please be true!!"

As far as Nunes, I think he's far closer to the truth of all this than, for example, Schiff.