Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
Based upon what evidence? If it's indeed ridiculous, he should be out front supporting the investigation to support his opinion that doesn't comport with the consensus of the intelligence community about such a serious matter.
Regardless of whether the hacking was intended to simply disrupt the election or discredit our country (and not help Trump directly), both are grievous actions by the Russians and Trump (and his surrogates) shouldn't be so cavalier about dismissing it ("I don't believe it at all.") He should forcefully demand an investigation, not tweet insults about the CIA.
|
First, in post 35, you engage in a complete flight of fancy about what you believe Trump "knows" about Russian hacking (based apparently on your mind reading skills
), then you challenge me about evidence? Finn, you're unhinged.
Here are a couple of pieces of evidence for you:
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Donna Brazille
You might have noticed that both have lost their roles in the DNC due to emails that were intercepted and made public. Whoever grabbed those emails didn't have to falsify a thing. The truth of what each was doing was enough, and it would have been the truth if Trump were a candidate or not.