A professor of criminal law, criminal procedure, and crime victims' rights at the S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah analyzes the forensic evidence and witness testimony and concluded that the physical evidence was consistent with Wilson's testimony and that the grand jury had no evidence that effectively contradicted Wilson's testimony.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/v...d-the-officer/
He further states
"Perhaps the reason for this disinterest in the ballistics report, autopsies and other similar information is that for at least some of Brown’s supporters the facts are, apparently, largely irrelevant because Brown is a metaphorical “symbol” of injustice regardless of what actually happened."
This last statement is certainly true of a number of folks on this board.