As the thing notes, requiring notice of non-washing constitutes regulation. His beginning admission of bias (irrational animus) against regulation is correct.
Last edited by donquixote99; 02-03-2015 at 05:58 PM.
As the thing notes, requiring notice of non-washing constitutes regulation. His beginning admission of bias (irrational animus) against regulation is correct.
Say wha? My 'Universal Translator' is on the fritz.
Happened to us a few weeks ago. Had a nice dinner at The Corner Bakery and were squirting and puking for two days. Called 'em and the manager says, "Oh we check everything. Our logs for that day are perfect. It must have been something you ate at home." Honest to christ.
When I asked if he checked to see if the chef washed his hands after he took his afternoon dump, he was all offended that I would suggest such a thing.
That said...sure there oughta be a federal law. If for no other reason than having a little bit more backup when you drag their assess into civil court.