Israel has invaded Gaza...

[nailer]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Another candidate for the ignore list old friend.

I beg your pardon, but Ike's saying that Finn was in bed with ... , is an acceptable political response, including the inflammatory adjectives.

BTW, Ike didn't call finnbow a fucking idiot, regardless of any intended respect.


Aren't ignore lists something HS girls do?

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by nailer

I beg your pardon, but Ike's saying that Finn was in bed with ... , is an acceptable political response, including the inflammatory adjectives.

BTW, Ike didn't call finnbow a fucking idiot, regardless of any intended respect.


Aren't ignore lists something HS girls do?

Naw, when someone distills their argument down to saying that any criticism of Israel makes someone an anti semite and a supporter of the 9/11 hijackers, I don't see much sense in debating them.

[piece-itpete]

Anti semite, racist, nazi, they'll get the hackles up.

Pete

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by nailer

I beg your pardon, but Ike's saying that Finn was in bed with ... , is an acceptable political response, including the inflammatory adjectives.

Inflammatory is an acceptable political response?

Let's you and him fight? With flamethrowers?

Originally Posted by nailer

BTW, Ike didn't call finnbow a fucking idiot, regardless of any intended respect.

Aren't ignore lists something HS girls do?

And here, allow me to offer this additional gift of gasoline?

[nailer]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Naw, when someone distills their argument down to saying that any criticism of Israel makes someone an anti semite and a supporter of the 9/11 hijackers, I don't see much sense in debating them.

Therein lies the rub. Amongst us apes debate is precluded when strong emotions/beliefs unite with divisive political issues, resulting in our arguing in circles which makes us dizzy and prickly.

[nailer]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

Let's you and him fight? With flamethrowers?

Honorable gentlemen duel.

Are you offering to be Bob's or Bob's second? Bob would prefer sabers.

[finnbow]

What's remarkable is how it is perfectly OK to criticize our own foreign/defense policy, as well as that of all of our allies (e.g., Germany, France, Turkey...), but if one dares to criticize the policies/tactics of Israel's ruling Likud coalition, you're a terrorist. If you're an Israeli Prime Minister seeking peace with the Palestinians against the wishes of the Israeli Right, it gets you assassinated.

[Ike Bana]

Originally Posted by finnbow

I'm in bed with Hamas? With all due respect, you're a fucking idiot.

Bibi introduced the Hamas=ISIS meme to the foreign press just after the Foley beheading video was made public in a cynical attempt to quash foreign criticism of Israel's tactics in Gaza. It seems to have worked on you, less so on others.

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/israe...q-extremists-0

So just because Bibi and I are on the same side of an argument the argument is automatically wrong. Yeh...and I'm the fucking idiot.

You think Bibi's comments have anything to do with the history I've presented. His comments don't have a fuckwad worth of anything to do with the information I've presented, unless he used the same section of the Hamas charter and the same quotes from the same high ranking Hamas officials. In which case you'll be wrong about Bibi as well as wrong about everything else you hold up Hamas to be. Hamas is cut from the same cloth as Isis and Al-Qaeda as documented from their own charter and from their own mouths. And a long time before Bibi uttered Hamas=ISIS.

You said Hamas was not seeking a Caliphate. Their own charter says Hamas' goal is an Islamic Caliphate around the world. Their own people identify their goal as an Islamic Caliphate. How's about you zip your spine back in, retrieve your cojones from out your other pants, ditch the frothy righteous indignation, and acknowledge that you've been proven wrong.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by Ike Bana

So just because Bibi and I are on the same side of an argument the argument is automatically wrong. Yeh...and I'm the fucking idiot.

You think Bibi's comments have anything to do with the history I've presented. His comments don't have a fuckwad worth of anything to do with the information I've presented, unless he used the same section of the Hamas charter and the same quotes from the same high ranking Hamas officials. In which case you'll be wrong about Bibi as well as wrong about everything else you hold up Hamas to be. Hamas is cut from the same cloth as Isis and Al-Qaeda as documented from their own charter and from their own mouths. And a long time before Bibi uttered Hamas=ISIS.

You said it was not a Caliphate. Their own charter says it's goal is an Islamic Caliphate around the world. Their own people identify their goal as an Islamic Caliphate. How's about you zip your spine back in, retrieve your cojones from out your other pants, ditch the frothy righteous indignation, and acknowledge that you've been proven wrong.

Here's a thoughtful article on the topic. I suppose the author is also in bed with Hamas.

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middl...ate-True-video

I didn't realize that not fully buying into Bibi's schtick qualified somebody as a terrorist. If it does, that renders the majority of the world terrorists.

[Ike Bana]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Naw, when someone distills their argument down to saying that any criticism of Israel makes someone an anti semite and a supporter of the 9/11 hijackers, I don't see much sense in debating them.

Anti-Semite my ass. The only thing I've suggested is that it's interesting that the only time there's a problem about occupiers of the West Bank and Gaza, it's when the occupiers are Jews. That's history...if the history makes anybody feel like they're being called an anti-Semite that's their fucking problem.

This guy has been all over this forum like the fucking middle eastern sociology expert because he spend 5 days wandering aimlessly around the West Bank, and he's all over me like a cheap suit. But I prove him wrong, with un-biased information that cannot be construed as anything but what it is...proof that Hamas, ISIS and Al-Qaeda all have the same self-stated fucking goal and he's flaming like 5 below. He's been out here proclaiming that Hamas are fucking freedom fighters. When they're no different from the 9/11 hijackers. They just have different innocent people for targets for christ's sake.

And this is like it is on every lefty forum. When another lefty shows up and is a supporter of the state of Israel they just go fucking apeshit. You can come on here and be a member of the fucking Westboro Baptist Church and not get the hostile response you get because you won't take a giant shit on Benjamin Netanyahu.