Trump Pulls Out of The Paris Accord

[whell]

Originally Posted by Chicks

Lol, the site you link to has a link right up top to something called "ConservativeU". Clearly a fake news site, no doubt financed by the coal industry. Sorry, but your sources are biased. Real scientists are The species that you and all other living human beings on this planet belong to is Homo sapiens. .

Yet, the sources that you use to cite the your claim of "nearly universal agreement" are themselves often biased. What this breaks down to is a scenario where both sides of the discussion end up rejecting each other's arguments without even considering them, like you just did.

[Chicks]

Originally Posted by whell

Yet, the sources that you use to cite the your claim of "nearly universal agreement" are themselves often biased. What this breaks down to is a scenario where both sides of the discussion end up rejecting each other's arguments without even considering them, like you just did.

Sorry, real science isn't biased. It's peer reviewed, time after time, to ensure that it's as accurate as possible, leading to consensus. The consensus is clear. There is no doubt. Your fake news sites are funded by those who would benefit by obfuscating the facts. Wake up! Why do you continue to post nonsense? You would have been a "good German" under Hitler. Or are you a "good Russian" under Putin?

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by whell

No, there's not "agreement". There's an alleged consensus, but consensus isn't part of scientific methodology. In fact, the claim of consensus is dubious.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_in_Academia

Bwahahahaaa.

[Chicks]

The industry money behind the Republicans who urged Trump to pull out of the accord. As always, follow the money...

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ergy-donations

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by whell

Yet, the sources that you use to cite the your claim of "nearly universal agreement" are themselves often biased. What this breaks down to is a scenario where both sides of the discussion end up rejecting each other's arguments without even considering them, like you just did.

C'mon, man. It took only a short search to see that your source is as nuts as they come. Look at the founder of this family business - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed_Irvine.

[Pio1980]

Question​.
Did the idiot in chief ever read the agreement and/or has he any idea what is in it ?
I'm guessing no, and no.

[Pio1980]

http://crooksandliars.com/2017/06/tr...t-its-own-sake

[Dondilion]

Originally Posted by Chicks

Sorry, real science isn't biased. It's peer reviewed, time after time, to ensure that it's as accurate as possible, leading to consensus. The consensus is clear. There is no doubt. Your fake news sites are funded by those who would benefit by obfuscating the facts. Wake up! Why do you continue to post nonsense? You would have been a "good German" under Hitler. Or are you a "good Russian" under Putin?

Now Putin is linked with Hitler.

[Pio1980]

Originally Posted by Dondilion

Now Putin is linked with Hitler.

And Trump.

[Dondilion]

Originally Posted by Pio1980

And Trump.

Which makes the link meaningless contextually.