Baltimore County Police Fatally Shoot 23yo Woman

[Wasillaguy]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Sorry, but I'm having trouble wrassling up a bunch of faux sympathy and outrage over, much less interest in, this event.

I agree, seems pretty cut and dried.
These are some of the same posters who were dismissing a mass shooting of 17 people as something I had to dig up on the internet so I could bash blacks.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

First they came for the black people. And I didn't speak out, because I wasn't black.

She didn't get shot for being black (just as her companion didn't get shot at all). She got shot for pointing a shotgun at cops serving her a warrant (one of the outstanding charges was resisting arrest). She was a victim of her own stupidity.

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Sorry, but I'm having trouble wrassling up a bunch of faux sympathy and outrage over, much less interest in, this event.

Originally Posted by Wasillaguy

I agree, seems pretty cut and dried.
These are some of the same posters who were dismissing a mass shooting of 17 people as something I had to dig up on the internet so I could bash blacks.

Fascinating that our resident racist picked that particular post to agree with, isn't it Finn?

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by finnbow

If she were unarmed, yes. Being armed and threatening is another matter. The mother is responsible for being the protector of the child. She failed herself and the child.

Would it matter if the child was someone else's, an innocent 3rd party not otherwise involved? Would that get in the way of transfering all the responsibility to the mother and leaving the police with none?

If so, isn't that tantamount to saying that the child partakes in the mother's guilt in some way, and so is not deserving of protection?

[Wasillaguy]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

Fascinating that our resident racist picked that particular post to agree with, isn't it Finn?

Nothing particularly fascinating about it. He was the first to describe the reaction as "faux outrage", and I agree with that sentiment.

Nothing surprising about you slinging race cards out like you're dealing pinochle either.

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by Wasillaguy

Nothing particularly fascinating about it. He was the first to describe the reaction as "faux outrage", and I agree with that sentiment.

Nothing surprising about you slinging race cards out like you're dealing pinochle either.

Very convenient to you and your friend to dismiss my reaction as 'faux.' But it isn't. It isn't outrage either. I've just been asking questions. But that's too much for you guys, for some reason.

[Wasillaguy]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

Very convenient to you and your friend to dismiss my reaction as 'faux.' But it isn't. It isn't outrage either. I've just been asking questions. But that's too much for you guys, for some reason.

If you've just been asking questions, you missed about 30 or so question marks at the end of sentences.

[donquixote99]

^^^ Oooooo. Such wit!

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

Would it matter if the child was someone else's, an innocent 3rd party not otherwise involved? ...

Not to my level of interest in the case.

[donquixote99]

But you keep posting in this thread, and imagine that others are importuning you in ways that have not happened. I suspect faux indifference.