|
|
|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|

09-09-2020, 08:15 PM
|
 |
Ready
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,928
|
|
|
Every electoral vote over 270 represents down-ticket strength that makes the Senate blue!
__________________
By Any Means Necessary
|

09-09-2020, 08:33 PM
|
 |
Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,330
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99
Every electoral vote over 270 represents down-ticket strength that makes the Senate blue!
|
What this country needs is a thorough Californication, good and hard. Fair elections mean we have an almost 2/3 majority in the state legislature and the Devin Nunes's of this state represent mostly sagebrush and horned toads in the central valley. I'm hoping for enough gains in state legislatures to correct some of the gerrymandering done a decade ago.
|

09-09-2020, 08:52 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,538
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode
What this country needs is a thorough Californication, good and hard. Fair elections mean we have an almost 2/3 majority in the state legislature and the Devin Nunes's of this state represent mostly sagebrush and horned toads in the central valley. I'm hoping for enough gains in state legislatures to correct some of the gerrymandering done a decade ago.
|
A Californication is exactly what we'll need because any Repubs not up for election yet will try to throw as many wrenches into the works as they can.
__________________
The first casualty of war is the truth.
[ Greek dramatist Aeschylus ]
|

09-09-2020, 09:12 PM
|
 |
Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,330
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickeyM
A Californication is exactly what we'll need because any Repubs not up for election yet will try to throw as many wrenches into the works as they can.
|
2018 was a good indication, imo. There is a silent majority and she's not having this t'Rump.
|

09-10-2020, 07:49 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,538
|
|
|
Indeed 2018 was a good indication. That's why the Repubes are trying their best to act like it never happened.
Joe needs to be more fired up and go after tRump on lying about Covid-19. Remind everyone that so much of the damage, the lives ruined and lost is because tRump lied to save his hide.
__________________
The first casualty of war is the truth.
[ Greek dramatist Aeschylus ]
|

09-11-2020, 01:33 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,348
|
|
|
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.
|

09-15-2020, 07:05 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 14,446
|
|
Scientific American backs Biden for its first presidential endorsement in 175 years
https://www.washingtonpost.com/scien...can-joe-biden/
Quote:
In an urgent and impassioned editorial first published online Tuesday, the editorial board endorsed former vice president Joe Biden, the Democratic nominee, calling him the candidate “who is offering fact-based plans to protect our health, our economy and the environment.”
It was a striking move for the oldest continuously published magazine in the United States and one its editor in chief, Laura Helmuth, said was both carefully considered and entirely necessary.
Four years ago, the magazine flagged Donald Trump’s disdain for science as “frightening” but did not go so far as to endorse his rival, Hillary Clinton. This year, its editors came to a different conclusion.
|
I grew up reading the beloved SA, especially loved The Amateur Scientist column. I definitely share their disdain for the dangerous anti-science dimwit current occupant of the Oval Office.
__________________
"In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -
George Orwell
|

09-15-2020, 07:10 PM
|
 |
Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,330
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicks
Scientific American backs Biden for its first presidential endorsement in 175 years
https://www.washingtonpost.com/scien...can-joe-biden/
I grew up reading the beloved SA, especially loved The Amateur Scientist column. I definitely share their disdain for the dangerous anti-science dimwit current occupant of the Oval Office.
|
That's simultaneously cool as hell and alarming.  Those are some smart folk at SA.
|

09-15-2020, 08:04 PM
|
 |
Rational Anarchist
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,323
|
|
Oops! A Freudian slip?
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
Last edited by nailer; 09-15-2020 at 08:10 PM.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 PM.
|