Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 06-18-2012, 01:21 PM
whell whell is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreak View Post
Do you feel that being forced to buy insurance, or anything else for that matter, by "the government" is a violation of your rights as an American citizen?

If so, then how can the State of Ohio (A government.) do just that?
The US constitution is a document designed to specifically limit the powers of the Federal Gov't. it also states that powers not enumerated in the constitution are reserved for the states. The two scenarios you propose are therefore not incompatible.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-18-2012, 01:24 PM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,451
There are no provisions in the U.S. Constitution granting power to the federal government?
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 06-18-2012, 01:27 PM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
The US constitution is a document designed to specifically limit the powers of the Federal Gov't. it also states that powers not enumerated in the constitution are reserved for the states. The two scenarios you propose are therefore not incompatible.
There are no examples, in our history, of the federal government having to step in and assert power in times when states violate individual rights....
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 06-18-2012, 01:32 PM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
The US constitution is a document designed to specifically limit the powers of the Federal Gov't. it also states that powers not enumerated in the constitution are reserved for the states. The two scenarios you propose are therefore not incompatible.
"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union.

That was why the Constitution was written because Conferacy was not bloody well working

You left of the bit about or the people since if this is a truly democratic republic eeven the states only have the powers that free citizens are willing to grant them. States Rights Shmates Rights, what about Peoples Rights?
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt

Last edited by merrylander; 06-18-2012 at 01:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-18-2012, 01:33 PM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete View Post
No, it isn't whether health care is a right, it's whether the Constitution gives the Feds the authority to force it.

Federalism. It's what's for supper.

Pete
If the SCOTUS strikes down the individual mandate as unconstitutional, a violation of my rights as an American citizen-----then, how is it constitutional for the Commonwealth of Virginia to violate this right?
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 06-18-2012, 01:33 PM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
What, me worry?
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,227
Here's some of their powers: http://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A1Sec8.html

Consider this. The Constitution is a contract. So you and me enter a lease on a house. I can then take your car? It isn't in the contract...

When a judge says that's correct, it doesn't cover the car, that does not prevent me from owning a car.

Pete

[EDIT: the Constitution covers more than individual rights. Therefore, just because it's unConstitutional doesn't mean it's a violation of my personal rights, just that the Federal government overstepped their legal boundry.]
__________________
"America is still a land of promise, especially during a political campaign."
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 06-18-2012, 01:36 PM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,451
What?

I think you still miss the point.

What good is having any rights as a US citizen, if your city or state can simply write these rights out of their own constitution, or legislate them away?

The federal government can't seize your weapons, but the City of New York and Mayor Bloomberg can?
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa

Last edited by BlueStreak; 06-18-2012 at 01:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 06-18-2012, 01:40 PM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
What, me worry?
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,227
There's a basic misunderstanding going on here. The court case isn't about personal rights, that health care is or isn't a personal right. It's about whether the Federal government has the authority to force you to buy health insurance.

Pete
__________________
"America is still a land of promise, especially during a political campaign."
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 06-18-2012, 01:42 PM
whell whell is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreak View Post
There are no examples, in our history, of the federal government having to step in and assert power in times when states violate individual rights....
Sure there are. But there are no current lawsuits challenging the state's implementation of health reform. That's not to say that an individual or group won't challenge the MA law. However, given the left-leaning politics in that state, it seems unlikely.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 06-18-2012, 01:42 PM
Zeke's Avatar
Zeke Zeke is offline
Sir Lord Vader of Cheam
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lewiston, ID
Posts: 5,069
Send a message via Yahoo to Zeke
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete View Post
There's a basic misunderstanding going on here. The court case isn't about personal rights, that health care is or isn't a personal right. It's about whether the Federal government has the authority to force you to buy health insurance.

Pete
They seem to be able to force me to pay taxes and register for Selective Service...
__________________
"American" means calling everyone who disagrees with you a traitor?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.