America's Frontline Doctors - COVID 19 summit eye opener

[FordGT90]

Originally Posted by Chicks

As, of course, do NYT and WaPo, despite your uninformed opinion of them.

NYT is scant in terms of bias:
https://www.nytimes.com/editorial-st...ournalism.html

So is NYT:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...and-standards/

Compared that to Associated Press which dedicates an entire section to eliminating bias and Reuters, which includes eliminating bias as two core tenets of their organization.

See, this quote from NYT unnerves me:

Thus The Times and members of its news department and editorial page staff share an interest in avoiding conflicts of interest or an appearance of a conflict.

It's a common thread throughout their ethics statements. It's not about process to eliminate bias, it's fundamentally about firing people that create conflicts with their interests. Compare that to Reuters:

Thomson Reuters is dedicated to upholding the Trust Principles and to preserving its independence, integrity, and freedom from bias in the gathering and dissemination of information and news.

Literally "freedom from bias." That should be the goal of every media organization out there.

[Chicks]

Originally Posted by FordGT90

NYT is scant in terms of bias:
https://www.nytimes.com/editorial-st...ournalism.html

So is NYT:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...and-standards/

Compared that to Associated Press which dedicates an entire section to eliminating bias and Reuters, which includes eliminating bias as two core tenants of their organization.

See, this quote from NYT unnerves me:

It's a common thread throughout their ethics statements. It's not about process to eliminate bias, it's fundamentally about firing people that don't create conflicts with their interests.

Tenets. Sigh.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by FordGT90

NYT is scant in terms of bias:
https://www.nytimes.com/editorial-st...ournalism.html

So is NYT:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...and-standards/

Compared that to Associated Press which dedicates an entire section to eliminating bias and Reuters, which includes eliminating bias as two core tenants of their organization.

See, this quote from NYT unnerves me:

It's a common thread throughout their ethics statements. It's not about process to eliminate bias, it's fundamentally about firing people that create conflicts with their interests. Compare that to Reuters:

Yeah, horseshit.

[FordGT90]

Originally Posted by Chicks

Tenets. Sigh.

Fixed, thanks.

Originally Posted by bobabode

Yeah, horseshit.

What a fantastic rebuttal! Tell us more.

[watsup1000]

Originally Posted by FordGT90

NYT is scant in terms of bias:
https://www.nytimes.com/editorial-st...ournalism.html

So is NYT:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...and-standards/

Compared that to Associated Press which dedicates an entire section to eliminating bias and Reuters, which includes eliminating bias as two core tenets of their organization.

See, this quote from NYT unnerves me:

It's a common thread throughout their ethics statements. It's not about process to eliminate bias, it's fundamentally about firing people that create conflicts with their interests. Compare that to Reuters:

Literally "freedom from bias." That should be the goal of every media organization out there.

Ya mean like FOX and Breitbart? Ya mean like those types of media?

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by FordGT90

What a fantastic rebuttal! Tell us more.

Why should I, Skippy? All you bring to the party is some lame Galloping GIsh arguments followed by some old worn out and threadbare crap from St. Ronnie's children of the corn.

I'll bet you gamer boys are the shizznit over at TBD or wherever you and your friend came from. What's your handle over there? I'd love to entertain myself for a minute, gamer.

[FordGT90]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Why should I, Skippy?

Because forums are literally places for discussion?

Originally Posted by bobabode

All you bring to the party is some lame Galloping GIsh arguments followed by some old worn out and threadbare crap from St. Ronnie's children of the corn.

I didn't understand any of that.

Originally Posted by bobabode

I'll bet you gamer boys are the shizznit over at TBD or wherever you and your friend came from. What's your handle over there? I'd love to entertain myself for a minute, gamer.

I'll give you one guess.

[Chicks]

Originally Posted by FordGT90

Because forums are literally places for discussion?

All of your posts here so far show that you have no interest in discussion at all, rather in pushing the same tired, old, conservative bullshit, most of which has been debunked long ago.

[Not Insane]

Originally Posted by Chicks

All of your posts here so far show that you have no interest in discussion at all, rather in pushing the same tired, old, conservative bullshit, most of which has been debunked long ago.

Talk about projection - full on...

[Not Insane]

Originally Posted by FordGT90

Because forums are literally places for discussion?


I didn't understand any of that.


I'll give you one guess.

I don't think the leftists here are used to people who don't back down to bullies. If one can't make a cohesive argument on a political forum, they have no real place there. Ad-hominem doesn't cut it.