2016 Vote Totals - Clinton +1.75 Million And Counting

[donquixote99]

million of votes. How many jelly stains?

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

million of votes. How many jelly stains?

Hopefully not that many.

But however many there are, the election workers shouldn't have to clean up after these pigs.

Maybe they need to print the following on these absentee ballots.

"Please return your ballots clean, your mother does not work at the elections office"

[Tom Joad]

http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecur...ary-didnt-lose

Liberals searching for answers to Donald Trump’s surprise victory in the presidential election have latched on to a new explanation: Hillary Clinton didn’t really lose.

A growing “audit the vote” movement, which has garnered high-profile backers like “Avengers” director Joss Whedon and actress Debra Messing, argue election tampering or incompetence may have led to Trump being declared the winner.

They are demanding that the Department of Justice and election officials check voting machines and vote totals to make sure the results in the states of Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania are accurate.

Trump has been declared the winner in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania and has a lead in Michigan, where some media groups have declared him the winner.

If the results in all three states were for the Democrat, Clinton, who has a lead in the popular vote of nearly 2 million over Trump, would also have the Electoral College lead.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aBjdUf_TX4

[Rajoo]

Hardcore Hillary supporters were anything but liberal or progressive.

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by Rajoo

Hardcore Hillary supporters were anything but liberal or progressive.

You got that right.

[merrylander]

Originally Posted by Rajoo

Hardcore Hillary supporters were anything but liberal or progressive.

Horse feathers.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by merrylander

Horse feathers.

You're too kind Rob.

[bobabode]

"On Wednesday afternoon, near the start of one of the year's final news droughts, former Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein announced a new campaign: to pay for recounts in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. The news went first to the journalist Greg Palast, then on Stein's Facebook page, then in an interview with the Russian propaganda channel RT.
“This has been a hack-riddled election,” Stein explained. “We have voting machines that are extremely hack-friendly in an election that's been very contentious.”" WaPo

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...mepage%2Fstory

Self aggrandizement would be my guess.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by merrylander

Horse feathers.

Originally Posted by bobabode

You're too kind Rob.

I was being kind too.

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by bobabode

"On Wednesday afternoon, near the start of one of the year's final news droughts, former Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein announced a new campaign: to pay for recounts in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. The news went first to the journalist Greg Palast, then on Stein's Facebook page, then in an interview with the Russian propaganda channel RT.
“This has been a hack-riddled election,” Stein explained. “We have voting machines that are extremely hack-friendly in an election that's been very contentious.”" WaPo

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...mepage%2Fstory

Self aggrandizement would be my guess.

Not a good guess. This election is close enough that a look should be taken, to see if there is anything to see. As a candidate Jill has standing to make the recount request, and she is not bound by Hillary's pledge not to contest the results. This is an anti-Trump, pro-Hillary move.