Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas
It can also be read as an insurgency aimed at throwing out an invader and defeating the local goon squad the invader created to enforce his totalitarian will.
Interesting that Peter Jackson left it out of his film.
|
The 'foreign invader' part is I think part and parcel of how Tolkien did his war myths--mostly, the evil enemy is literally inhuman. Thus in the case of the Shire, the real evil ones are non-Hobbits. The good society that is restored is homogenous, unified, organic, freed of evil outside elements. A conservative vision.
Overlooking this sort of obligatory foreign aspect, the subversion of the Shire parallels a view of the subversion of Germany by the Nazis, with Bilbo's cousin Lotho, the nominal 'chief,' playing the role of the rich conservatives who bankrolled the Nazis, only to see them establish a brutal regime that acted outside their control or desires.
The theme is of course it doesn't matter if you win the big foreign war if the homeland is lost to subversion in the meantime. Jackson likely did see this chapter as a bit difficult, but his claim that he was out of movie time has validity too. As it was, Return of the King had turned into, as Jack Nicholson observed, a film with ending after ending after ending....