|
|
|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|

12-18-2013, 07:25 AM
|
 |
Koch-Teapublican
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Hartland, MI
Posts: 1,395
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode
Yeah, riiiight- upsid down death spiral.  keep on listening to those voices in yer head, Jim. You guys crack me up with the florid apocalyptical crap that you repeat.
If they started dinging everyone at seven bones right at the gitgo...all of you 'baggers would be up in arms and a'screeching redfaced at your representative in the house of fools.  Not that it would do much good.
|
The "Death Spiral" is not a right wing or tea party apocalyptic crap.
It's accounting apocalyptic crap.
Death Spiral
The repeated elimination of products without a corresponding decrease in overhead costs. As a result the amount of overhead allocated to each unit of product increases. If selling prices are increased to cover the higher per unit allocated costs, fewer units might be sold. With fewer unit sales and no reduction in overhead costs, the remaining products will be assigned greater per unit overhead costs. If selling prices are increased to cover these still higher unit costs, there could be a further decline in sales
You know we could call it "downward demand spiral" but that just doesn't sound as cool
__________________
'Never ending security threats...' Final Diary Entry:C. Stevens 9/11/12
|

12-18-2013, 08:09 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBS...
The "Death Spiral" is not a right wing or tea party apocalyptic crap.
It's accounting apocalyptic crap.
Death Spiral
The repeated elimination of products without a corresponding decrease in overhead costs. As a result the amount of overhead allocated to each unit of product increases. If selling prices are increased to cover the higher per unit allocated costs, fewer units might be sold. With fewer unit sales and no reduction in overhead costs, the remaining products will be assigned greater per unit overhead costs. If selling prices are increased to cover these still higher unit costs, there could be a further decline in sales
You know we could call it "downward demand spiral" but that just doesn't sound as cool 
|
So...when it comes to health care...WTF is it that you want? You want a return to the fucked up for-profit, insurance industry controlled, employment linked, twice as expensive system with shit outcomes like we've had for over 4 decades? With over 30 million un-insured driving up the costs? That's what you want?
You people are at the point where, when it comes to Obama, all we hear outta you is "everything stinks" and you're too unconscious to realize you have your heads buried the bucket of dogshit that is FOXNEWS and the EIB.
|

12-18-2013, 08:17 AM
|
 |
Ready
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,928
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBS...
The "Death Spiral" is not a right wing or tea party apocalyptic crap.
It's accounting apocalyptic crap.
Death Spiral
The repeated elimination of products without a corresponding decrease in overhead costs. As a result the amount of overhead allocated to each unit of product increases. If selling prices are increased to cover the higher per unit allocated costs, fewer units might be sold. With fewer unit sales and no reduction in overhead costs, the remaining products will be assigned greater per unit overhead costs. If selling prices are increased to cover these still higher unit costs, there could be a further decline in sales
You know we could call it "downward demand spiral" but that just doesn't sound as cool 
|
Thank-you for a nice cite of high-school-level accounting. Now can you translate that in concrete terms to the ACA situation, which is certainly much more complex? On the face of it, products (health care policies) are being changed, some eliminated, but in the net increased. Sales are increased, some overhead is up, some down, there are manifold funding streams going back and forth. It's not instantly obvious where the 'thing that sounds cool' is actually happening.
I'll await your analysis. (I'm pretty sure I'll just get glib propaganda, but there's nothing like asking....)
|

12-18-2013, 11:23 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
|
|
|
And if I might provide a reminder...the plan changes, the doctor changes, the policy adjustments, but most of all the reduction in available doctors and medical groups in certain geographic areas is being generated by the for-profit insurance industry as a way for them and for the same for-profit medical groups to maintain their profit margins (they like to call it "cost control") under the new law.
So Obama's plan to bring down cost will happen and the ignorant American public needs to decide who it's pissed off at. IMO we should be pissed off at the insurance industry and the medical profession...FOX/EIB addicts will be pissed off at the Kenyan anti-colonialist.
|

12-18-2013, 11:35 AM
|
 |
What, me worry?
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,227
|
|
|
Didn't the insurance industry write the law?
Pete
__________________
"America is still a land of promise, especially during a political campaign."
|

12-18-2013, 11:50 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete
Didn't the insurance industry write the law?
Pete
|
IMO Willard's people in Massachusetts wrote it. Primarily a team headed up by MIT econ professor Jonathan Gruber. I like Gruber a lot. Particularly after hearing what Gruber said when he heard Romney's attacks on the ACA, "It's the same fucking bill."
So I'm gonna say...no...the insurance industry did not write the law.
|

12-18-2013, 12:01 PM
|
 |
What, me worry?
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,227
|
|
Are we talking about the same Congress?
Pete
__________________
"America is still a land of promise, especially during a political campaign."
|

12-18-2013, 12:10 PM
|
 |
What, me worry?
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,227
|
|
|
Hmmm, 'Liz Fowler' is mentioned a lot.
Pete
__________________
"America is still a land of promise, especially during a political campaign."
|

12-18-2013, 12:14 PM
|
 |
Koch-Teapublican
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Hartland, MI
Posts: 1,395
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ike Bana
So...when it comes to health care...WTF is it that you want? You want a return to the fucked up for-profit, insurance industry controlled, employment linked, twice as expensive system with shit outcomes like we've had for over 4 decades? With over 30 million un-insured driving up the costs? That's what you want?
You people are at the point where, when it comes to Obama, all we hear outta you is "everything stinks" and you're too unconscious to realize you have your heads buried the bucket of dogshit that is FOXNEWS and the EIB.
|
I mean this in the nicest possible way. Every post I read of yours, I get this vision of a monkey flinging shit. But to answer your question, YES
__________________
'Never ending security threats...' Final Diary Entry:C. Stevens 9/11/12
|

12-18-2013, 12:34 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBS...
I mean this in the nicest possible way. Every post I read of yours, I get this vision of a monkey flinging shit. But to answer your question, YES
|
And I mean this in the nicest possible way. Every post I read of yours, I get this vision of a face with prefrontal lobotomy bruising.
So it's yes then. Twice the money for 40th best outcomes...the lobotomy is obviously working great for you. And 45,000 needlessly dead Americans every year. Ahhh you kinder and gentler conservatives, eh?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 AM.
|