Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #391  
Old 12-18-2013, 07:25 AM
JBS...'s Avatar
JBS... JBS... is offline
Koch-Teapublican
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Hartland, MI
Posts: 1,395
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode View Post
Yeah, riiiight- upsid down death spiral. keep on listening to those voices in yer head, Jim. You guys crack me up with the florid apocalyptical crap that you repeat.

If they started dinging everyone at seven bones right at the gitgo...all of you 'baggers would be up in arms and a'screeching redfaced at your representative in the house of fools. Not that it would do much good.
The "Death Spiral" is not a right wing or tea party apocalyptic crap.

It's accounting apocalyptic crap.

Death Spiral

The repeated elimination of products without a corresponding decrease in overhead costs. As a result the amount of overhead allocated to each unit of product increases. If selling prices are increased to cover the higher per unit allocated costs, fewer units might be sold. With fewer unit sales and no reduction in overhead costs, the remaining products will be assigned greater per unit overhead costs. If selling prices are increased to cover these still higher unit costs, there could be a further decline in sales

You know we could call it "downward demand spiral" but that just doesn't sound as cool
__________________
'Never ending security threats...' Final Diary Entry:C. Stevens 9/11/12
Reply With Quote
  #392  
Old 12-18-2013, 08:09 AM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBS... View Post
The "Death Spiral" is not a right wing or tea party apocalyptic crap.

It's accounting apocalyptic crap.

Death Spiral

The repeated elimination of products without a corresponding decrease in overhead costs. As a result the amount of overhead allocated to each unit of product increases. If selling prices are increased to cover the higher per unit allocated costs, fewer units might be sold. With fewer unit sales and no reduction in overhead costs, the remaining products will be assigned greater per unit overhead costs. If selling prices are increased to cover these still higher unit costs, there could be a further decline in sales

You know we could call it "downward demand spiral" but that just doesn't sound as cool
So...when it comes to health care...WTF is it that you want? You want a return to the fucked up for-profit, insurance industry controlled, employment linked, twice as expensive system with shit outcomes like we've had for over 4 decades? With over 30 million un-insured driving up the costs? That's what you want?

You people are at the point where, when it comes to Obama, all we hear outta you is "everything stinks" and you're too unconscious to realize you have your heads buried the bucket of dogshit that is FOXNEWS and the EIB.
Reply With Quote
  #393  
Old 12-18-2013, 08:17 AM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBS... View Post
The "Death Spiral" is not a right wing or tea party apocalyptic crap.

It's accounting apocalyptic crap.

Death Spiral

The repeated elimination of products without a corresponding decrease in overhead costs. As a result the amount of overhead allocated to each unit of product increases. If selling prices are increased to cover the higher per unit allocated costs, fewer units might be sold. With fewer unit sales and no reduction in overhead costs, the remaining products will be assigned greater per unit overhead costs. If selling prices are increased to cover these still higher unit costs, there could be a further decline in sales

You know we could call it "downward demand spiral" but that just doesn't sound as cool
Thank-you for a nice cite of high-school-level accounting. Now can you translate that in concrete terms to the ACA situation, which is certainly much more complex? On the face of it, products (health care policies) are being changed, some eliminated, but in the net increased. Sales are increased, some overhead is up, some down, there are manifold funding streams going back and forth. It's not instantly obvious where the 'thing that sounds cool' is actually happening.

I'll await your analysis. (I'm pretty sure I'll just get glib propaganda, but there's nothing like asking....)
Reply With Quote
  #394  
Old 12-18-2013, 11:23 AM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
And if I might provide a reminder...the plan changes, the doctor changes, the policy adjustments, but most of all the reduction in available doctors and medical groups in certain geographic areas is being generated by the for-profit insurance industry as a way for them and for the same for-profit medical groups to maintain their profit margins (they like to call it "cost control") under the new law.

So Obama's plan to bring down cost will happen and the ignorant American public needs to decide who it's pissed off at. IMO we should be pissed off at the insurance industry and the medical profession...FOX/EIB addicts will be pissed off at the Kenyan anti-colonialist.
Reply With Quote
  #395  
Old 12-18-2013, 11:35 AM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
What, me worry?
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,227
Didn't the insurance industry write the law?

Pete
__________________
"America is still a land of promise, especially during a political campaign."
Reply With Quote
  #396  
Old 12-18-2013, 11:50 AM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete View Post
Didn't the insurance industry write the law?

Pete
IMO Willard's people in Massachusetts wrote it. Primarily a team headed up by MIT econ professor Jonathan Gruber. I like Gruber a lot. Particularly after hearing what Gruber said when he heard Romney's attacks on the ACA, "It's the same fucking bill."

So I'm gonna say...no...the insurance industry did not write the law.
Reply With Quote
  #397  
Old 12-18-2013, 12:01 PM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
What, me worry?
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,227
Are we talking about the same Congress?

Pete
__________________
"America is still a land of promise, especially during a political campaign."
Reply With Quote
  #398  
Old 12-18-2013, 12:10 PM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
What, me worry?
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,227
Hmmm, 'Liz Fowler' is mentioned a lot.

Pete
__________________
"America is still a land of promise, especially during a political campaign."
Reply With Quote
  #399  
Old 12-18-2013, 12:14 PM
JBS...'s Avatar
JBS... JBS... is offline
Koch-Teapublican
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Hartland, MI
Posts: 1,395
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ike Bana View Post
So...when it comes to health care...WTF is it that you want? You want a return to the fucked up for-profit, insurance industry controlled, employment linked, twice as expensive system with shit outcomes like we've had for over 4 decades? With over 30 million un-insured driving up the costs? That's what you want?

You people are at the point where, when it comes to Obama, all we hear outta you is "everything stinks" and you're too unconscious to realize you have your heads buried the bucket of dogshit that is FOXNEWS and the EIB.
I mean this in the nicest possible way. Every post I read of yours, I get this vision of a monkey flinging shit. But to answer your question, YES
__________________
'Never ending security threats...' Final Diary Entry:C. Stevens 9/11/12
Reply With Quote
  #400  
Old 12-18-2013, 12:34 PM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBS... View Post
I mean this in the nicest possible way. Every post I read of yours, I get this vision of a monkey flinging shit. But to answer your question, YES
And I mean this in the nicest possible way. Every post I read of yours, I get this vision of a face with prefrontal lobotomy bruising.

So it's yes then. Twice the money for 40th best outcomes...the lobotomy is obviously working great for you. And 45,000 needlessly dead Americans every year. Ahhh you kinder and gentler conservatives, eh?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.