Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 08-14-2014, 08:55 AM
Tom Joad's Avatar
Tom Joad Tom Joad is offline
Persona non grata
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 12,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pio1980 View Post
Try reading the article, your tolerance for tyranny is quite remarkable.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
I'm going to go way out on a limb here and say I believe Don was being sarcastic.
__________________
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend."
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 08-14-2014, 08:57 AM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Joad View Post
I'm going to go way out on a limb here and say I believe Don was being sarcastic.
Pio was mixed-up, it's been sorted, all is well. Miscues happen in our text world.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 08-14-2014, 09:00 AM
Tom Joad's Avatar
Tom Joad Tom Joad is offline
Persona non grata
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 12,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode View Post
If they act like this with the national media spotlight on them, imagine what they are like when when "encountering" ordinary citizens when their car cameras are conveniently "out of order"
__________________
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend."
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 08-14-2014, 09:37 AM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
1968, I'd say. 1968.

I may have taken that picture.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 08-14-2014, 09:45 AM
MrPots MrPots is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Joad View Post
If they act like this with the national media spotlight on them, imagine what they are like when when "encountering" ordinary citizens when their car cameras are conveniently "out of order"
I've seen this too many times. The officers "orchestrate" an arrest. You follow their directions, so they make it impossible for you to do so (like blocking your way) so they can lie and say you were resisting and slap you around.


Fucking thugs.....
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 08-14-2014, 09:45 AM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
Let's just focus on this. Let's say that a LEO grabs some part of my anatomy, pulls hard, and brings me in painful contact with some part of a police cruiser. I naturally try to break his grip and avoid further painful trauma. According to you, he now has the right to kill me?
I gotta say it seems to me that to the best of one's ability, Zeke attempted to deal in simple information that is currently available...and stated so.

In response he got more speculation. One can pretty accurately assume that any comment beginning with "Let's say..." has already moved into a different basis of presentation than pure available facts.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 08-14-2014, 09:49 AM
MrPots MrPots is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeke View Post
Define "peaceful?"

There's no manner in which to look good here but the last "peaceful" demonstration devolved into ugliness.

The only choice is to snuff things early or be responsible for later.

And before anyone screams about tear gas? That is showing restraint.
With all due respect, you're doing a stellar job of defending your own.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 08-14-2014, 09:50 AM
MrPots MrPots is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
Bad night to wax ironic, i guess.

Zeke has stated (in the other topic) that if you impede, you make yourself the enemy of the police.
Actually, it's absolutely clear to me that if you aren't in uniform you make yourself an enemy of the police. If you're black you may as well hide in the basement.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 08-14-2014, 09:55 AM
MrPots MrPots is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
Let's just focus on this. Let's say that a LEO grabs some part of my anatomy, pulls hard, and brings me in painful contact with some part of a police cruiser. I naturally try to break his grip and avoid further painful trauma. According to you, he now has the right to kill me?

If so, bad has become normal and lawful, and I want it changed. The idea of taking away the guns from police comes to mind.

If not, then facts that will probably have to be weighed by a jury come into play. Basically, did Mike Brown assault the officer, or did the officer grab Mike Brown through the car window, in a way the Brown could reasonably interpret not as an arrest for jaywalking, but as an attempt to harm him?

I don't think the officer departed the station that morning with the intent of killing some citizen. But I think that, like you, he has a very critical story in his head about the kids that were jaywalking. Something about 'generational rage, and entitlement,' in your case, as I recall. He may have gotten mad when he saw the kids in the street. He may have told them to 'get the fuck on the sidewalk,' or something like that.

This command, for some reason, may have produced a reaction he didn't like. He may have made a move with the police cruiser that put him in close proximity with Michael Brown. He then may have attempted to quickly exit the cruiser, but the door hit Brown, then came back and hit the officer. He may, rightly or wrongly, have interpreted this as an assault by Brown. This may have caused him to become enraged, and respond by grabbing Brown through the car window, and shooting him.

Is there any part of this possible scenario that does not fit the agreed-on facts that we have? Is it in some way outlandish, so that even though possible, is it absurdly unlikely?

I think this story, consistent with witness reports in the media, is possible. I think the police should acknowledge this possibility to the community. They should release the officers name, as an assurance that he is being investigated and will be held responsible if evidence of wrongdoing is found. I think they should acknowledge that the shooting of the young man was a tragedy, even if it turns out to be 'justified.' I think they should pledge at this point to try harder to avoid such tragedies in the future. I think there should be respectful, open dialog with an understandably-upset community.

I think the fact that this has NOT been the police response, so far, is contributing to the continued unrest. So far all people have heard is stuff like what you've said. And what you keep saying is that 'killing Michael Brown was his job.' And fuck you.

I know, neither the police or you have added the 'fuck you.' But I assure you the aggrieved citizens of Ferguson think they hear it, right at the end of the cold, clipped, defensive stone-wall prose. Loud and clear.
Stellar.....
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 08-14-2014, 10:25 AM
Tom Joad's Avatar
Tom Joad Tom Joad is offline
Persona non grata
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 12,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ike Bana View Post
I gotta say it seems to me that to the best of one's ability, Zeke attempted to deal in simple information that is currently available...and stated so.

In response he got more speculation. One can pretty accurately assume that any comment beginning with "Let's say..." has already moved into a different basis of presentation than pure available facts.
You gotta be shitin me.

Zeke has been 100% in the tank for the cops from the get go.
__________________
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.