Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 06-09-2014, 10:24 PM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
They WERE the leadership of Afghanistan before they were forcibly removed. They are NOW a fundamentalist political movement in Afghanistan, and as this weekend's activity demonstrates, still very much interested in terrorism.

While Iran maybe a STATE sponsor of terrorism, they are still a STATE.

Anyone who quibbles about definitions this compulsively is either 1) schizophrenic, or 2) ridiculously PARTISAN.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 06-09-2014, 10:42 PM
Dondilion's Avatar
Dondilion Dondilion is offline
Jigsawed
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
No, I'm not drawing a direct line between the release of Bergdahl and the events this weekend in Pakistan. However, I think its work reminding ourselves exactly who we negotiated with, and have now by extension recognized as an international entity. 23 dead, and the Taliban have claimed responsibility.

http://www.hometownlife.com/usatoday/article/10220535
According to BBC news the Taliban claims it is a reprisal for a drone attack.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 06-09-2014, 10:51 PM
Dondilion's Avatar
Dondilion Dondilion is offline
Jigsawed
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,189
A look at drone strikes in Pakistan.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drone_attacks_in_Pakistan
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 06-10-2014, 06:44 AM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dondilion View Post
According to BBC news the Taliban claims it is a reprisal for a drone attack.
Also according to BBC news the Taliban in Pakistan is not affiliated with the Taliban in Afghanistan.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 06-10-2014, 06:54 AM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,552
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
They WERE the leadership of Afghanistan before they were forcibly removed. They are NOW a fundamentalist political movement in Afghanistan, and as this weekend's activity demonstrates, still very much interested in terrorism.

While Iran maybe a STATE sponsor of terrorism, they are still a STATE.
The fact remains that we went to war against Afghanistan ruled by the Taliban. Another factoid - these 5 bad guys were held for 10 years and never charged or prosecuted for any crime. They were POW's.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.

Last edited by finnbow; 06-10-2014 at 08:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 06-10-2014, 09:16 AM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
And I suppose the question might arise that who TF are we to invade a sovereign nation because we don't like who it's government chooses for it's friends? Who it gives aid and comfort to? Lots of countries give aid and comfort to enemies of this country. If we were to believe the propaganda we were fed by our government, every sovereign communist bloc country (including Cuba) provided aid and comfort to enemies of this country for over 40 years.

But all of a sudden because a pack of fanatics, most of whom were Saudi's (otherwise our long-term trusted allies), managed to pull off 9/11 under the noses of the CIA, FBI, NSA, and AFLCIO...we go marching in to a shithole like Afghanistan. Why didn't we invade Saudi Arabia...oh no, can't do that, we need cheap gas for our POS Chevy Suburbans.

Perhaps we should have gone marching into Russia in 1955 or 1965 or 1975 for giving aid and comfort to enemies of this country, and had our asses handed to us on a plate. Nah let's go for some of that low hanging political fruit...let's invade Iraq, Afghanistan, Panama and Grenada. We even got our asses handed to us on a plate by the Vietnamese for christ's sake.

Last edited by Ike Bana; 06-10-2014 at 10:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 06-10-2014, 09:22 AM
Pio1980's Avatar
Pio1980 Pio1980 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,348
Also why Saddam was to be the example to other bad actors like Iran and North Korea, and we see how well that went.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 06-10-2014, 09:30 AM
4-2-7 4-2-7 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ike Bana View Post
And I suppose the question might arise that who TF are we to invade a sovereign nation because we don't like who it's government chooses for it's friends? Who it gives aid and comfort to? Lots of countries give aid and comfort to enemies of this country. If we were to believe the propaganda we were fed by our government for, every sovereign communist bloc country (including Cuba) provided aid and comfort to enemies of this country for over 40 years.

But all of a sudden because a pack of fanatics, most of whom were Saudi's (otherwise our long-term trusted allies), managed to pull off 9/11 under the noses of the CIA, FBI, NSA, and AFLCIO...we go marching in to a shithole like Afghanistan. Why didn't we invade Saudi Arabia...oh no, can't do that, we need cheap gas for our POS Chevy Suburbans.

Perhaps we should have gone marching into Russia in 1955 or 1965 or 1975 for giving aid and comfort to enemies of this country, and had our asses handed to us on a plate. Nah let's go for some of that low hanging political fruit...let's invade Iraq, Afghanistan, Panama and Grenada. We even got our asses handed to us on a plate by the Vietnamese for christ's sake.

Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 06-10-2014, 10:49 AM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4-2-7 View Post
Nice to finally know what you look like. That said...what? You disagree?
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 06-10-2014, 11:50 AM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,926
Someone told 427 that with his writing skill, he's better off sticking to pure pictures.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.