Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 08-09-2012, 11:22 AM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
I guess we could count the times Romney has told the truth on the fingers of one finger. Chaps I do not feel any need to defend Florence to anyone.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 08-09-2012, 11:42 AM
beej's Avatar
beej beej is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 511
Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylander View Post
Chaps I do not feel any need to defend Florence to anyone.
And I don't blame you, sir.
__________________
Butch
Extremist Moderate
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 08-09-2012, 11:48 AM
mezz mezz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 543
The Obama campaign has now been caught lying on this by saying they knew nothing about the contents of this ad and were ignorant of the details of Joe Soptic's life when it has just come out that Soptic told essentially the same story already on a recorded Obama Campaign phone call back in May.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/o...195237581.html

More floundering and backtracking to come...
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 08-09-2012, 12:13 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by mezz View Post
The Obama campaign has now been caught lying on this by saying they knew nothing about the contents of this ad and were ignorant of the details of Joe Soptic's life when it has just come out that Soptic told essentially the same story already on a recorded Obama Campaign phone call back in May.

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/o...195237581.html

More floundering and backtracking to come...
This is the excerpt of Soptic's conversation with the Obama campaign, straight from the blog you linked to:

"After we lost our jobs, we found out that we were going to lose our health insurance, and that our pensions hadn't been funded like Bain promised they would be. I was lucky to find another job as a custodian in a local school district. They gave me some health insurance, but I couldn't afford to buy it for my wife. A little while later she was diagnosed with lung cancer. I had to put her in a county hospital because she didn't have health care, and when the cancer took her away, all I got was an enormous bill. That put a lot of stress on me: I thought I'd be paying it off until I died myself. That probably wouldn't have happened if Bain kept its promise and I was allowed to keep our health insurance."

It contains no reference to his wife's insurance coverage. That was mentioned to CNN later.

This is what the campaign said:

"I don't know the facts about when Mr. Soptic's wife got sick, or the facts about his health insurance."

So, where's the problem, mess? (sic)

When you find out that the campaign knew about the Priorities USA ad in advance and approved it in advance, get back to us, okay?

John
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 08-09-2012, 01:15 PM
mezz mezz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
This is the excerpt of Soptic's conversation with the Obama campaign, straight from the blog you linked to:

"After we lost our jobs, we found out that we were going to lose our health insurance, and that our pensions hadn't been funded like Bain promised they would be. I was lucky to find another job as a custodian in a local school district. They gave me some health insurance, but I couldn't afford to buy it for my wife. A little while later she was diagnosed with lung cancer. I had to put her in a county hospital because she didn't have health care, and when the cancer took her away, all I got was an enormous bill. That put a lot of stress on me: I thought I'd be paying it off until I died myself. That probably wouldn't have happened if Bain kept its promise and I was allowed to keep our health insurance."

It contains no reference to his wife's insurance coverage. That was mentioned to CNN later.

This is what the campaign said:

"I don't know the facts about when Mr. Soptic's wife got sick, or the facts about his health insurance."

So, where's the problem, mess? (sic)

When you find out that the campaign knew about the Priorities USA ad in advance and approved it in advance, get back to us, okay?

John

You're kidding, right? Whaddya think I am some kind of dim witted Obama supporter? You reprinted the quote right in the same post where you denied what it said. It's all about his health insurance and his wife's lack of it:

"After we lost our jobs, we found out that we were going to lose our health insurance, and that our pensions hadn't been funded like Bain promised they would be. I was lucky to find another job as a custodian in a local school district. They gave me some health insurance, but I couldn't afford to buy it for my wife. A little while later she was diagnosed with lung cancer. I had to put her in a county hospital because she didn't have health care, and when the cancer took her away, all I got was an enormous bill."

So while his health insurance may indeed have been mentioned also on CNN later, it was also mentioned in May in the conference call hosted by Ms. Stephanie "“I don’t know the facts about when Mr. Soptic’s wife got sick or the facts about his health insurance” Cutter herself.

This is why the Obama campaign is once again bumbling and floundering over this which is just the latest example of Obama himself or his campaign spokespeople blurting out lies before thinking about what they are saying in attempts to cover up their embarrassing level of sleazy and underhanded behaviour. Trying to lie yourself to defend them is just silly.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 08-09-2012, 01:27 PM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Even if Soptic's wife had insurance through her job, she could have remained on her husband's policy as well. The fact is that she did not have insurance at the time she took ill, and had Soptic's job at GST not been eliminated, she would have continued to be covered on his policy.

Regards,

D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 08-09-2012, 01:28 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by mezz View Post
Whaddya think I am some kind of dim witted Obama supporter?
No, I think you're some kind of idiot Teabagger.

The issue is his wife's coverage.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 08-09-2012, 01:52 PM
bhunter's Avatar
bhunter bhunter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Diego California
Posts: 3,272
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657 View Post
Even if Soptic's wife had insurance through her job, she could have remained on her husband's policy as well. The fact is that she did not have insurance at the time she took ill, and had Soptic's job at GST not been eliminated, she would have continued to be covered on his policy.

Regards,

D-Ray
"I had to put her in a county hospital because she didn't have health care."

So the government operated county hospital failed to give a minimum standard of care? I'm not seeing how her husband's job loss can remotely be connected to her cancer death.
__________________
Dear Optimist: Unless life gives you water and sugar too, your lemonade will suck.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 08-09-2012, 01:57 PM
mezz mezz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 543
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657 View Post
Even if Soptic's wife had insurance through her job, she could have remained on her husband's policy as well. The fact is that she did not have insurance at the time she took ill, and had Soptic's job at GST not been eliminated, she would have continued to be covered on his policy.

Regards,

D-Ray
It is possible (and plausible from Soptic's statements) that he had opted for the individual policy vs. the family coverage, a choice which is offered on a lot of plans. The family coverage premiums can be 3 or 4 times what the individual coverage costs and I believe Soptic claims that he (they) could not afford to have her on his plan.

This works the same in places with universal coverage like in Canada, where only very basic stuff is covered, but a lot of the 'extras' like ambulance service, followup drugs, continued care, extended treatment, private hospital room, etc etc are not covered and the patient needs their own private insurance.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 08-09-2012, 01:58 PM
mezz mezz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
No, I think you're some kind of idiot Teabagger.

The issue is his wife's coverage.
You probably wish.

His wife's coverage (and lack of was mentioned in the quote). Sorry. Please try again.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.