The OFFICIAL Hillary Death Spiral Thread!

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by noonereal

No, no no.

You insist you know my desires in 10 days of reading my posts more than I know myself in 60 years of self analysis.

I am not in any way "in" the Trump camp.

Bernie, Donald and Hill are the 3 candidates I found acceptable to win it all. The poster proposed all 3 run in the general hence my glee.

Not being emotionally abhorred by Trump is not the same as being one of his toothless zealots.

Not having been you for 60 years may actually make me more objective on this matter. I stand by my characterization (though I never figured you were toothless.) You may, when you wax rational, not plan to vote for Trump, but you do love him.

[nailer]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

Anyone who loves Trump would love that.

QFT

noonereal's man crush offered as Exhibit A.

[nailer]

Originally Posted by noonereal

No, no no.

You insist you know my desires in 10 days of reading my posts more than I know myself in 60 years of self analysis.

I am not in any way "in" the Trump camp.

Bernie, Donald and Hill are the 3 candidates I found acceptable to win it all. The poster proposed all 3 run in the general hence my glee.

Not being emotionally abhorred by Trump is not the same as being one of his toothless zealots.

Too much self analysis will drive you crazy.

The only candidate I'd vote for is Bernie and I will visit the booth if he is on the ballot.

What I don't understand is how any New Deal/Great Society Democrat could with good conscience not vote for Bernie in their primary. Opinion?

[Boreas]

Ng/ds?

[68custom]

Originally Posted by noonereal

No, no no.



I am not in any way "in" the Trump camp.



Not being emotionally abhorred by Trump is not the same as being one of his toothless zealots.

I heard a rumor that some of the Drumph minions have sharp incisors.

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by 68custom

I heard a rumor that some of the Drumph minions have sharp incisors.

http://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2016...ni-nr-intv.cnn

[Boreas]

Two recent developments regarding the Clinton emails. The first is self explanatory, albeit troubling and not a little suspicious. The second appears pretty innocuous but the important message here is that the FBI is getting pretty aggressive. There are two possible explanations for this. One is that there is a political component to their aggressive posture. The second is that they are onto something. Either way, it looks bad.

http://www.investors.com/politics/ca...usly-vanished/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...6e0_story.html

[Tom Joad]

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by Boreas

Two recent developments regarding the Clinton emails. The first is self explanatory, albeit troubling and not a little suspicious. The second appears pretty innocuous but the important message here is that the FBI is getting pretty aggressive. There are two possible explanations for this. One is that there is a political component to their aggressive posture. The second is that they are onto something. Either way, it looks bad.

http://www.investors.com/politics/ca...usly-vanished/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...6e0_story.html

"Mills, an attorney herself, was not supposed to be asked questions about that — and ultimately never was in the recent interview — because it was considered confidential as an example of attorney-client privilege, the people said." WaPo

Sounds like the FBI dude wanted Mills to break attorney/client privilege and she told them to shove it.

At least IBD isn't the WSJ or the Washington Times but it still looks like it leans right.

[Tom Joad]

The unsugarcoated truth here is that Hillary compromised top secret intelligence information, and endangered the lives of US intelligence and military personnel the world over because she was felt she was too good to have to go into the office to work.