FAKE NEWS EXPOSED: A Service of PoliticalChat.com

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

Finn, apparently getting your facts straight is about as important to you as it is to Media Matters. I quote from the Washington Post and the NY Times. In fact, one of your fellow travelers on this forums recently commented "So what?" when I posted from a NY Times poll.

Please try to at least get something right if you're going to comment about it. LOL.

As far as Bump's article in WaPo, Bump is an absolute tool. And if you're going to take Bump's characterization of Archer's testimony at face value, I can only conclude that you didn't actually read the transcipt of the testimony. You're simply parrotting what a spinmeister like Bump is telling you.

Let me help you a bit…

Damn, fella. You are truly obsessed with Hunter Biden. In an effort to assuage your concerns, I promise not to vote for him as president.

Watching you swallow the latest GOP attempt to distract the base away from the ongoing legal troubles of Trump and his criminal accomplices is truly a sight to behold. Your mind is a terrible thing to lose and your long-winded post confirms my assertion that the longer a post of yours is, the more desperate you are to recover from an embarrassingly stupid position.

Get back with me when Joe Biden is indicted for multiple felonies. Meanwhile, I will stick with watching your Dear Leader go down in flames.

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by Chicks

Whell, you have some sort of psychological issue. OCD, perhaps? Get yourself diagnosed, please, for your own good.

Wow, that's the whellian "Because they don't have proof it didn't happen means it did happen." logic. I the real world, the one the courts operate in, it's proof (evidence) or it didn't happen. In MAGA-land it's guilty unless you can prove you're innocent.

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Damn, boy. You are truly obsessed with Hunter Biden. I’ll make sure not to vote for him as president.

Watching you swallow the latest GOP attempt to distract the base away from the ongoing legal troubles of Trump and his MAGA minions across the country is truly a sight to behold. Your mind is a terrible thing to lose.

Get back with me when Joe Biden is indicted for multiple felonies. Meanwhile, I will stick with watching your Dear Leader go down in flames.

Pass the popcorn Finn

[whell]

Originally Posted by Chicks

Whell, you have some sort of psychological issue. OCD, perhaps? Get yourself diagnosed, please, for your own good.

Originally Posted by Rajoo

As a Businessman, Trump Was the Biggest Loser of All


https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-c...t-loser-of-all

Originally Posted by finnbow

Damn, fella. You are truly obsessed with Hunter Biden. In an effort to assuage your concerns, I promise not to vote for him as president.

Watching you swallow the latest GOP attempt to distract the base away from the ongoing legal troubles of Trump and his criminal accomplices is truly a sight to behold. Your mind is a terrible thing to lose and your long-winded post confirms my assertion that the longer a post of yours is, the more desperate you are to recover from an embarrassingly stupid position.

Get back with me when Joe Biden is indicted for multiple felonies. Meanwhile, I will stick with watching your Dear Leader go down in flames.

You guys are hillarious. Following the typical pattern for your responses:

1) Insult the poster.
2) Ignore the facts.
3) Mischaracterize the poster's comments.
4) Change the topic.

Bravo.

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by whell

You guys are hillarious. Following the typical pattern for your responses:

1) Insult the poster.
2) Ignore the facts.
3) Mischaracterize the poster's comments.
4) Change the topic.

Bravo.

This from the forum laughingstock. Say what you will, he never disappoints.

[whell]

Originally Posted by RickeyM

This from the forum laughingstock. Say what you will, he never disappoints.

See post 3414, item 1.

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by whell

You guys are hillarious. Following the typical pattern for your responses:

1) Insult the poster.
2) Ignore the facts.
3) Mischaracterize the poster's comments.
4) Change the topic.

Bravo.

You are the expert in all the above. You do it constantly. You did it when you posted the above.

Here, by item:

1. Insulted the posters and others by calling them hilarious.

2. You ignore that, despite long investigation by a Trump-appointed special prosecutor, Joe Biden has been indicted for nothing, and Hunter Biden has been indicted only for things totally unrelated to alleged influence peddling. Your facts in your long post that quoted Archer testimony transcripts do not even allege any wrongdoing by President Biden. A theory from a witness that some third party might feel intimidated is a million miles even from evidence that they were, much less that the President intended such result and took illegal action to produce it.

3. You mischaracterize the posts by insinuating that they wrongly disregard good arguments from you. Except the good arguments were never made (see point 2).

4. You have changed the topic, from allegations of wrongdoing by President Biden, to allegations of bad posting practices by others here.

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

You are the expert in all the above. You do it constantly. You did it when you posted the above.

Here, by item:

1. Insulted the posters and others by calling them hilarious.

2. You ignore that, despite long investigation by a Trump-appointed special prosecutor, Joe Biden has been indicted for nothing, and Hunter Biden has been indicted only for things totally unrelated to alleged influence peddling. Your facts in your long post that quoted Archer testimony transcripts do not even allege any wrongdoing by President Biden. A theory from a witness that some third party might feel intimidated is a million miles even from evidence that they were, much less that the President intended such result and took illegal action to produce it.

3. You mischaracterize the posts by insinuating that they wrongly disregard good arguments from you. Except the good arguments were never made (see point 2).

4. You have changed the topic, from allegations of wrongdoing by President Biden, to allegations of bad posting practices by others here.

As I said, he never fails to disappoint.
EDIT: Or should that be never disappoints to fail?

[Rajoo]

I am shameless and unprincipled. So how about Javanka, who it seems is slithering back intt Trump's orbit again. Can't be family loyalty nor the weather, so what is it? A grifting opportunity would be my guess. And how about this?

Ivanka might be forgiven for her conflicted relationship with Trump. He’s Daddy, after all. But familial attachments do not — and did not — qualify her or Kushner to serve as senior advisers to the president of the United States. When Kushner was denied security clearance by career intelligence officers because of concerns about foreign influence, outside business interests and personal conduct, Trump overrode them.

As for Kushner’s credulity-straining role as impromptu diplomat to the Middle East, we can only wonder what other conversations took place as he persuaded leaders in Israel, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco to recognize Israel’s sovereignty and normalize relations among them. The Abraham Accords are widely viewed as a landmark development toward building relationships and mitigating tensions in the Persian Gulf region. But it is also increasingly clear that Kushner was simultaneously securing his own financial future via massive investments in his pop-up private equity firm, Affinity Partners, by many of the very same countries that signed the accords. Quelle coincidence.

Kushner’s biggest financial backer, however, was Saudi Arabia, which declined to sign the accords. This was of no consequence to Kushner, who was already pals with Mohammed bin Salman, commonly known as MBS, before joining the Trump White House. The two “princes,” both then in their 30s and eager to establish themselves on the international stage, reportedly bonded as only the born elite can.

Less than six months after leaving the White House, Kushner secured a $2 billion commitment from the Saudi sovereign wealth fund, which MBS controls, despite opposition from the fund’s board of directors because of Kushner’s lack of experience in private equity. Other countries followed suit, including signatories to the accords — the UAE, Qatar, Sudan and Morocco. Today, Affinity’s investment commitments have reached at least $3 billion, which is not a bad haul for a young adviser to a twice-impeached president who, recently arrested for the third time, faces several fresh indictments.

So if any First Son needs to be investigated, its Kushner and he very well may be a national security risk. And why didn't the Saudis sign the accord? Suspicious minds want to know.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...uption-return/

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by whell

See post 3414, item 1.

See post 3375, second paragraph. I said congratulations, it was a compliment (smile).