|
|
|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|

06-01-2016, 05:03 PM
|
|
Abby Normal
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrPots
Why do I have to belong to a party? I want to vote for "that person"...not a party.
|
it's how governess evolved.
Structure is need. Everything can be better but everything can also be worse.
|

06-01-2016, 05:04 PM
|
 |
Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,328
|
|
|
|

06-01-2016, 05:04 PM
|
 |
Ready
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,927
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrPots
Why do I have to belong to a party? I want to vote for "that person"...not a party.
|
Because if you don't belong to a party, the people who do will 'push you around,' politically. I don't know a way around that.
__________________
By Any Means Necessary
|

06-01-2016, 05:09 PM
|
 |
Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,328
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrPots
Why do I have to belong to a party? I want to vote for "that person"...not a party.
|
The Democratic party was good enough for Bernie Sanders, why isn't it for you?
|

06-01-2016, 05:11 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by icenine
You see the problem with being an independent is that there is no real party to belong to. If there was the Independent Party, with enough voters to participate at the same level as the two traditional parties in the primaries there would be an actual political force.
As it is being an independent is just a way of being a weak Republican or a weak Democrat since they tend to align themselves with either one eventually. Plus the dissolution of power disables a powerful majority in Congress and split-ticket voting which leads to what we have now.
Yeah someone will say there is an actual independent party but no not really.
One of the problems Sanders caused himself was not being a Democrat for all those years. No superdelegate one was going to switch from Hillary to him even if he got close enough to make them think about it. All the superdelegates are establishment Democrats.
|
You don't actually believe that do you? Washington is a closed shop.
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
|

06-01-2016, 05:14 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,554
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode
The Democratic party was good enough for Bernie Sanders, why isn't it for you? 
|
He was the only democrat running, seemed fitting to me.
__________________
It occurs to me that republicans seem to view black, Mexican, LGBT, Muslims and poor people in the same light as Nazi Germans once viewed Jewish people. We must be vigilant that it goes no further.
|

06-01-2016, 05:16 PM
|
 |
Ready
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,927
|
|
|
If there was an "Independent Party" that "participated at the same level as the two traditional parties," it would be a party, and those who belonged to it would not be independents.
__________________
By Any Means Necessary
|

06-01-2016, 05:18 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode
|
As I've been saying for months, Bernie's going to take California.
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
|

06-01-2016, 05:23 PM
|
 |
Admin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,328
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas
As I've been saying for months, Bernie's going to take California.
|
If he does it won't matter. Clinton will have the majority (2026) pledged delegates she needs on Tuesday night. It may even come before the polls close here in California.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 AM.
|