Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-27-2010, 07:03 AM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
Krauthammer is a bitter old man, so out of touch with the world that I stopped reading his diatribes years ago.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-27-2010, 09:05 AM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grumpy View Post
In no way am I defending writewing or whoever that fellow is in his link ( did not read it ). Fact I disagree with nearly everything he has to say but Obama won the Noble for one reason. The race card was such a lame reason to award it to him that I will no longer respect anyone who recieves the NPP..
Is that why Dr. King and Archbishop Tutu won?

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.

Last edited by Boreas; 01-27-2010 at 09:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-27-2010, 09:30 AM
Fast_Eddie's Avatar
Fast_Eddie Fast_Eddie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by Writewing View Post
When I heard about his budget "freeze" I thought at first it was a good idea but I spoke too soon before I really knew what was going on. Charles Krauthammer explained what we really need to understand about this gimmick.
Well, you put it in your typically combative manner, but I certainly agree it's a gimmick. As I've said, it's a purely political move.

But I guess the question is, so what? That's what they do. Under pressure to 'do something' (as if he's done nothing) about the economy, he took an easy step that didn't require anything being passed by congress but makes a good headline. They all do it. They all do it all the time. Doesn't do any good and is probably bad for the recovery. But the polling was probably good on it and it was easy to do. Had to get a couple of ticks in the "win" column before the SOTU.

Eh, not worth getting too worked up over. We've likely lost our only shot at actual health care reform in our lifetimes. If you're weighing things to worry about, I'd put that higher up the scale.

(edit) I see- or we could fight about the Nobel prize again. Why didn't I see it- that's what this is really about.
__________________
Two days slow. That's what they are.

Last edited by Fast_Eddie; 01-27-2010 at 09:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-27-2010, 09:32 AM
Fast_Eddie's Avatar
Fast_Eddie Fast_Eddie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by Writewing View Post
So this "freeze" doesnt affect 60% of our spending (Veterans, Pentagon, Social Security, Medicare, aid for other nations and so on)
You make a point that I've made for years- nothing significant can be done if you don't address military spending, Social Security, Medicade and Medicare. They're such a huge part of our budget you can't realize any significant saving if you don't start there.

Unfortunately, we've killed the only plan proposed in years that actually addressed any of these.
__________________
Two days slow. That's what they are.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-27-2010, 09:49 AM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,554
Back to the OP's (or Krauthammer's point). I don't think this "freeze" on discretionary spending can be viewed as anything other than a political and symbolic ploy. When you exempt Defense and "entitlement" spending as well as payment on the debt, there's precious little left over to freeze anyway. Whether you're freezing last year's inflated EPA budget (or their reduced budget from the year before) is immaterial. This is nothing more than a signal to "Main Street" that he feels our pain and senses our frustration. If this results in public support for other worthwhile initiatives, fine. If not, it'll just leave us scratching our heads.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-27-2010, 09:51 AM
Grumpy's Avatar
Grumpy Grumpy is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
Is that why Dr. King and Archbishop Tutu won?

John

No they deserved it.

Are you seriously comparing those two men to Obama ???
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-27-2010, 03:21 PM
Writewing's Avatar
Writewing Writewing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 371
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
Back to the OP's (or Krauthammer's point). I don't think this "freeze" on discretionary spending can be viewed as anything other than a political and symbolic ploy. When you exempt Defense and "entitlement" spending as well as payment on the debt, there's precious little left over to freeze anyway. Whether you're freezing last year's inflated EPA budget (or their reduced budget from the year before) is immaterial. This is nothing more than a signal to "Main Street" that he feels our pain and senses our frustration. If this results in public support for other worthwhile initiatives, fine. If not, it'll just leave us scratching our heads.
But do you think America will buy it?
__________________
Save H20, waterboard with Pig urine!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-27-2010, 03:30 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by Writewing View Post
But do you think America will buy it?
Nope. The Right will point of the relative ineffectiveness of this measure, while the Left will decry the freezing of the budgets of some of their "sacred cow" programs. I don't think this effort has many advocates.

OTOH, I think he'll use this as one of several measures to show he's fighting for the little guy (to include his newfound animosity toward the banks). When you combine several such actions, it might form a new narrative. But I doubt it.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.

Last edited by finnbow; 01-27-2010 at 03:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-27-2010, 03:31 PM
Fast_Eddie's Avatar
Fast_Eddie Fast_Eddie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by Writewing View Post
But do you think America will buy it?
Remains to be seen. Bet he mentions it as part of his agenda in the big speech.
__________________
Two days slow. That's what they are.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-27-2010, 03:39 PM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Writewing View Post
But do you think America will buy it?
I think it is another political misstep by Obama.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:10 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.