Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #141  
Old 08-18-2010, 12:04 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
The government has a duty to intervene when public interests are at stake, as they intervene to control and regulate other freedoms such as the right to assemble and freedom of religion.
What public interest is at stake here which would justify subverting the Constitution, that some people don't like it? What public harm is averted? What public good effected? By the standard you support the government should repeal the Emancipation Proclamation, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans With Disabilities Act... The list is virtually endless.

Hell, most people don't like Republicans very much if the last several elections are any indication. A lot of us find them pretty offensive so maybe they should be outlawed too.

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #142  
Old 08-18-2010, 12:13 PM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
. . .
Hell, most people don't like Republicans very much if the last several elections are any indication. A lot of us find them pretty offensive so maybe they should be outlawed too.

John
I'll drink to that!
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #143  
Old 08-18-2010, 12:27 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
This sentence pretty well sums it up.

"It isn't a stretch to say that the greatest threat to free speech is, in fact, 'sensitivity.'"

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #144  
Old 08-18-2010, 04:46 PM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
This sentence pretty well sums it up.

"It isn't a stretch to say that the greatest threat to free speech is, in fact, 'sensitivity.'"

John
There were some pretty whacked out posters after that too. The conclusion of one of them would be that we are sissies if we have the courage of our convictions.

Ms. Parker found another way to elegantly state that popular or non-controversial speech doesn't need the protection of the first amendment.

Regards,

D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote
  #145  
Old 08-18-2010, 05:13 PM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Here is an interview with one of the proponents of the mosque/community center. Those on either side of the argument might find ammunition there, but I think this lovely lady does an excellent job of describing the motivations behind the mosque.

Regards,

D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote
  #146  
Old 08-19-2010, 04:41 PM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Lots of very intelligent people are explaining why the government should not interfere with the construction of the Muslim cultural center. One reason that has been stated several times is that the opposition to the center provides ammunition to al-queda to recruit against the Great Satan. That view is supported by one the the FBI's most effective interrogators of suspected terrorists.

Regards,

D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote
  #147  
Old 08-19-2010, 05:11 PM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
I am just stupefied by the opposition to an Islamic center in lower Manhattan.

It's just scary how myopic people can be and how opportunist politicians can be.

Is there a politician left alive that places country ahead of party.
Reply With Quote
  #148  
Old 08-19-2010, 05:15 PM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657 View Post
Here is an interview with one of the proponents of the mosque/community center. Those on either side of the argument might find ammunition there, but I think this lovely lady does an excellent job of describing the motivations behind the mosque.

Regards,

D-Ray
good link but totally irrelevant

we are not and were never at war with the Muslim religion
Reply With Quote
  #149  
Old 08-19-2010, 05:41 PM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by noonereal View Post
we are not and were never at war with the Muslim religion
I think that is her point.

You're right, however, that their motivation for building a religious institution is irrelevant to their right to do so. The fact that they are exercising their faith is enough. (A more conservative-friendly reason for their right to do so is the rights of the property owner to make his or her chosen use of the property, so long as that use is not otherwise illegal.)

For that matter, the First Amendment also protects the right of the protesters to make whatever statements they want to make, even to the extent that it presents the world with a sorry picture of the state of tolerance and civility in this country.

Regards,

D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote
  #150  
Old 08-19-2010, 09:05 PM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreak View Post
If you can't watch Fox for more than thirty seconds and figure out what their deal is, then you have problems no brain surgeon can help you with. That has to be the worst asskissing organization on the entire planet. "TASS" couldn't have sucked up to a specific political party more ardently than Fox does. "Fair and Balanced"? Spare me.

Dave

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegra...e_Soviet_Union
yep,
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.