Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode
Coming up through the ranks of enlisted personnel to commandant of the corp sure sounds like a grunt made good in spades.
|
Precisely.
This guy, and the guy after him but it started with Gray, are the folks who came up with a new leadership dynamic that eradicated the post Vietnam, linear and non-thinking Marine/military dynamic.
Every Marine a rifleman? Yes, but they created The Crucible (a final test in Basic Training designed where only cooperative analysis and not cro-magnon dithering leads to success) as well as the concept of the Strategic Corporal. Now, with their recruits hitting forty-five? It is de rigueur across The Corp and it's leadership at every level.
At this point, the thinking/questioning qualities Ike and Joad often demean are precisely those sought by our Armed Forces and its leadership. That's why we perform so well in diverse situations, are leaders in coalitions, and otherwise maintain an adaptive flexibility shown by no other entity. It's also why many folks with military experience under the age of forty-five are so prized in the professional work force: you get the final third of someone's prime and they merely desire stability and respect while being accountable.
Veterans above forty-five, prior to the leadership revolution that eventually affected every branch? They can be
different. More inflexible. Brittle. Entitled. Boastful. Joadian(tm) or Ike Like(tm). Maybe that's because we've managed to not win everything they fought in and they consider it John Q.'s fault?
But there is an age related factor. Things needed to change and a Vietnam era platoon leader in a (much later) temporary appointed political position was in the right place to name a Marine Commandant and reform everything twenty years after Tet. Al Gray is a great leader, whose appointment was controversial, and the guy who appointed him (Jim Webb) eventually became a Senator.
I think Jim Webb is considering a run for President in 2016.