Sen. Bob Menendez of New Jersey, wife charged with bribery

[whell]

Originally Posted by Ike Bana

Sorry but your integrity is like a fart in a windstorm. No lefty here is defending Menendez, by any criteria...and particularly any criteria out of a MAGA traitor like you. If Menendez committed a crime, let him be convicted and do his time and/or pay his fine. If Hunter Biden committed a crime, let him be convicted and do his time and/or pay his fine. IF DONALD TRUMP COMMITTED A CRIME, LET HIM BE CONVICTED AND DO HIS TIME.

The issue here is hypocrites like you...when did anybody ever see you suggest that you're fine with Donald Trump going to prison...or any other Republican criminal either. Or any comment from you about all the fucking convicted criminals who were pardoned by Donald Trump.

Fucking hypocrites like you are the real problem. American people like you are the problem. It's always on the people. We all expect politicians to be vote whores. Americans are getting exactly the government they deserve, and that includes lefties who are waffling about voting for Joe Biden. And that includes the ultra-lib politicians and ultra-lib voters. Piss and moan about Joe Biden, because the alternative is Freedom Caucus traitors who want to bring down this democracy, flawed though it may be, will be who we end up with.

3 logical fallacies in a single post. Congrats, Ike.

https://www.grammarly.com/blog/logical-fallacies/
Ad hominem
An ad hominem fallacy is one that attempts to invalidate an opponent’s position based on a personal trait or fact about the opponent rather than through logic.

2 Red herring
A red herring is an attempt to shift focus from the debate at hand by introducing an irrelevant point.

3 Straw man
A straw man argument is one that argues against a hyperbolic, inaccurate version of the opposition rather than their actual argument.

[Chicks]

Originally Posted by whell

3 logical fallacies in a single post. Congrats, Ike.

https://www.grammarly.com/blog/logical-fallacies/
Ad hominem
An ad hominem fallacy is one that attempts to invalidate an opponent’s position based on a personal trait or fact about the opponent rather than through logic.

2 Red herring
A red herring is an attempt to shift focus from the debate at hand by introducing an irrelevant point.

3 Straw man
A straw man argument is one that argues against a hyperbolic, inaccurate version of the opposition rather than their actual argument.

Deflection, deflection, deflection. Thanks again for proving you're a sociopath.

[Ike Bana]

Originally Posted by whell

3 logical fallacies in a single post. Congrats, Ike.

2 Red herring
A red herring is an attempt to shift focus from the debate at hand by introducing an irrelevant point.

3 Straw man
A straw man argument is one that argues against a hyperbolic, inaccurate version of the opposition rather than their actual argument.

Congrats mikey, none of this is a drect challenge to anything in my post. This shit and your constant references to "whataboutism" are empty reactions without any actual argument.

But I will give you credit for your ability to use the urban dictionary of cute catchwords as you primary reference.

[whell]

Originally Posted by Ike Bana

Congrats mikey, none of this is a drect challenge to anything in my post. This shit and your constant references to "whataboutism" are empty reactions without any actual argument.

But I will give you credit for your ability to use the urban dictionary of cute catchwords as you primary reference.

But it is completely off topic and continues your effort to make the thread about anything other than Menendez.

[whell]

Originally Posted by Chicks

Deflection, deflection, deflection. Thanks again for proving you're a sociopath.

This coming from the racist who wants to make Clarence Thomas the topic instead of Menendez. You are so not self-aware.

[whell]

This one's for you Chickie and Ike:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...ion-rcna117075

In interviews on Sunday news programs, three Democratic senators were highly critical of Menendez, who was recently indicted on sweeping corruption charges, but did not call for him to vacate his seat in the Senate, where Democrats have a slim majority.


It's not about principles. It's about holding on to the majority in the Senate.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

This one's for you Chickie and Ike:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...ion-rcna117075

In interviews on Sunday news programs, three Democratic senators were highly critical of Menendez, who was recently indicted on sweeping corruption charges, but did not call for him to vacate his seat in the Senate, where Democrats have a slim majority.


It's not about principles. It's about holding on to the majority in the Senate.

He should resign, but protecting the country from TrumpoFascism is indeed very important.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by whell

This one's for you Chickie and Ike:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...ion-rcna117075

In interviews on Sunday news programs, three Democratic senators were highly critical of Menendez, who was recently indicted on sweeping corruption charges, but did not call for him to vacate his seat in the Senate, where Democrats have a slim majority.


It's not about principles. It's about holding on to the majority in the Senate.

Santos, George, Devolder.
That's three names for you to respond to.

[bobabode]

Poor Whell - his transparent & pitiful gambit of trying to get the members here to leap to the defense of Sen. Menendez crashed and burned. Must be a day that ends in a 'y'.

Sad.

[Chicks]

Democrats' response to the Menendez indictment tells all you need to know about today's GOP
https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/24/opini...lah/index.html

Good distillation of the response to Donny’s corruption by the horrific cretins of Whell’s World vs the far more responsible Dems’ response to Menendez’s alleged crimes.

Sorry Whell, but as always, you’re 100% wrong here, with zero credibility. You’ll never be welcomed in polite society, just like your Dear Leader. Sad little Trumpkin.