Quote:
Originally Posted by Dondilion
More disappointment...
From the article:
Kilimnik was likely a participant
Was Manafort passing information to him?
The thousand-page fifth volume doesn't definitely settle the question
The truth remains elusive, even after a careful Senate investigation
What is surprising here is the treatment of Mueller by the writer.
|
My god, man. Quoting sentences, and even partial sentences, without context, in a sequence that distorts their meaning? Your post is, frankly, blatantly dishonest. The article actually does not waffle on Manafort's communication with Kilimink, as the quote I provided indicates. And let's look at the complete sentence from which you lifted you concluding quote, along with the preceding sentence for context:
Quote:
|
It also shows that many other strands, and not just those involving Manafort, merit further investigation. So many aspects of Trump-campaign behavior were suspicious—and designed to evade detection—that the truth remains elusive, even after a careful Senate investigation.
|
You disappoint me, Dondi.
08-20-2020, 07:33 AM
Threaded Mode