The Affordable Care Act

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by icenine

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5167080.html

Eight million sign ups!!!!

[4-2-7]

38 Republicans put aside differences for lawsuit challenging legality of Obamacare


Thirty-eight Republican lawmakers, including such unlikely bedfellows as John McCain of Arizona and Ted Cruz of Texas, have joined to support a lawsuit challenging the legality of the Affordable Care Act and accusing the president of repeatedly ignoring the law he signed for political reasons.
The lawmakers have signed onto a legal brief in support of a lawsuit filed by Sen. Ron Johnson, the Wisconsin Republican who is asking a federal court to overturn Obamacare’s special treatment for members of Congress and their staffs.


“The unlawful executive action at issue in this case is not an isolated incident,” the brief states. “Rather, it is part of an ongoing campaign by the executive branch to rewrite the Affordable Care Act on a wholesale basis.”
The brief contends that, if left unchecked, the administration’s campaign “threatens to subvert the most basic precept of our system of government.”
“The president of the United States is constitutionally obligated to take care that the law be faithfully executed; he does not have the power to modify or ignore laws that have been duly enacted by Congress and that he believes are constitutional,” the friend-of-the-court brief states.


Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...#ixzz2zcqvjcDG
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

[Ike Bana]

Originally Posted by 4-2-7

38 Republicans put aside differences for lawsuit challenging legality of Obamacare


Thirty-eight Republican lawmakers, including such unlikely bedfellows as John McCain of Arizona and Ted Cruz of Texas, have joined to support a lawsuit challenging the legality of the Affordable Care Act and accusing the president of repeatedly ignoring the law he signed for political reasons.
The lawmakers have signed onto a legal brief in support of a lawsuit filed by Sen. Ron Johnson, the Wisconsin Republican who is asking a federal court to overturn Obamacare’s special treatment for members of Congress and their staffs.


“The unlawful executive action at issue in this case is not an isolated incident,” the brief states. “Rather, it is part of an ongoing campaign by the executive branch to rewrite the Affordable Care Act on a wholesale basis.”
The brief contends that, if left unchecked, the administration’s campaign “threatens to subvert the most basic precept of our system of government.”
“The president of the United States is constitutionally obligated to take care that the law be faithfully executed; he does not have the power to modify or ignore laws that have been duly enacted by Congress and that he believes are constitutional,” the friend-of-the-court brief states.


Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...#ixzz2zcqvjcDG
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzz....

[Pio1980]

Again? How much did the last effort waste? Just $24 Billion in lost commerce.
More of this shit will just make it that much easier for another Democrat to play POTUS, get a clue guys.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk

[4-2-7]

Originally Posted by Pio1980

Again? How much did the last effort waste? Just $24 Billion in lost commerce.
More of this shit will just make it that much easier for another Democrat to play POTUS, get a clue guys.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk

Do you prefer a dictatorship in this country?

Do you think that the President can changes law to suit there desires?

Do you think that all presidents should be able to change laws as they see fit?

Why do you think we have three separate branches of government?

[Pio1980]

Did I say any of that? No.

Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk

[Ike Bana]

Originally Posted by 4-2-7

Do you prefer a dictatorship in this country?

Yes.

Originally Posted by 4-2-7

Do you think that the President can changes law to suit there desires?

If you mean his desires. Yes.

PS - if you use the singular, the entire sentence should be in the singular e.g. ...the President can changes law to suit his desires...uh unless you meant to put the "s" on the end of "change" on the end of "President", in which case the sentence would have read "Presidents can change law to suit their (not there) desires." Just tryin' to help when and where I can.

BTW - you're not as dyslexic as you are just flat out too lazy to pay any attention to what you write. Victim role in 5...4...3...2...

Originally Posted by 4-2-7

Do you think that all presidents should be able to change laws as they see fit?

Yes.

Originally Posted by 4-2-7

Why do you think we have three separate branches of government?

We have three separate branches of gubmint?



Ask 4 stupid questions, get 4 stupid answers.

[Zeke]

Originally Posted by Ike Bana

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzz....

Double snooze.

[4-2-7]

Originally Posted by Ike Bana

Yes.



If you mean his desires. Yes.

PS - if you use the singular, the entire sentence should be in the singular e.g. ...the President can changes law to suit his desires...uh unless you meant to put the "s" on the end of "change" on the end of "President", in which case the sentence would have read "Presidents can change law to suit their (not there) desires." Just tryin' to help when and where I can.

BTW - you're not as dyslexic as you are just flat out too lazy to pay any attention to what you write. Victim role in 5...4...3...2...



Yes.



We have three separate branches of gubmint?



Ask 4 stupid questions, get 4 stupid answers.

See I knew you are an extremist commie bitch.

[bobabode]

Snore.....