Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-22-2025, 07:14 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,330
The Courts vs DJT

Looks like Donnie is fucking around and finding out that his judges won't stay bought. SCOTUS issues a late night rebuke (7-2) of his deportation of a Maryland resident without due process and now a Colorado court finds fault with his use of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime...8b49ead1&ei=38

Fat Donnie has been in a downright snit that his judges aren't kowtowing to him.

Poor old duffer.

Maybe it's time for Ivanka to confiscate his keys and cell phone before he hurts himself or others?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-23-2025, 08:43 AM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode View Post
Looks like Donnie is fucking around and finding out that his judges won't stay bought. SCOTUS issues a late night rebuke (7-2) of his deportation of a Maryland resident without due process and now a Colorado court finds fault with his use of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime...8b49ead1&ei=38

Fat Donnie has been in a downright snit that his judges aren't kowtowing to him.

Poor old duffer.

Maybe it's time for Ivanka to confiscate his keys and cell phone before he hurts himself or others?
The headline will read "Supreme Court Justice found murdered! MI-13 blamed!"
__________________
By Any Means Necessary
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-30-2025, 11:50 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,330
"President Donald Trump’s directives for mass firings at multiple agencies will remain on hold, a federal appeals court ruled Friday evening.

The Trump administration had asked the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to freeze a lower court’s order that halted the terminations at more than a dozen agencies.

The new order is a major setback for Trump in his efforts to drastically shrink the federal government. His plans for the sweeping layoffs – known as reductions in force, or RIFs – have been on hold since May 9, after US District Judge Susan Illston ruled that Trump could not do such a dramatic overhaul of federal agencies without congressional authorization.

In its 2-1 opinion, the 9th Circuit panel said the Trump executive order at issue in the case “far exceeds the President’s supervisory powers under the Constitution.”

The majority concluded that the challengers were likely to succeed on the merits of their arguments that the mass layoffs were unlawful and said the administration failed to meet the other factors that would have justified the emergency appellate intervention." CNN

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...c213fd31&ei=33

Chew on that, chump.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-31-2025, 02:00 AM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,330
"PBS has filed a lawsuit against President Donald Trump's administration challenging his executive order targeting public broadcasting.

PBS's lawsuit, filed in United States District Court in Washington, accuses the administration of unlawfully interfering in the operations of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and committing multiple violations of the First Amendment – viewpoint discrimination, illegal retaliation against the network and encroachment of PBS's press freedoms. The suit also alleges the administration has violated the Administrative Procedure Act.

The suit is filed by the network and its member station in Northern Minnesota, Lakeland PBS. It follows legal actions by NPR and the CPB, each of which seeks to block Trump's efforts to dismantle federal support for public radio and television, support that began with the passage of the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967.

"The EO makes no attempt to hide the fact that it is cutting off the flow of funds to PBS because of the content of PBS programming and out of a desire to alter the content of speech," the lawsuit states. "That is blatant viewpoint discrimination and an infringement of PBS and PBS Member Stations' private editorial discretion."" ABC News

https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/pb...dbc655a&ei=176

Big Bird and the Cookie Monster will take you down, Cryin' Donny.
Elmo will mess you up, dude.

Last edited by bobabode; 05-31-2025 at 02:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:32 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.