The Trump Crime Family - Legal Issues

[whell]

Originally Posted by Rajoo

You are being just as dishonest as your buddy Comer. As an HR guy you should know that 'professionals' usually do not get fired and get walked out. Usually they are given verbal threats in private, "walk or we will fire you". This is mostly to avoid any future wrongful discharge lawsuits, so please try not to play dumb here. I am speaking from personal experience how these things are handled. Want to bet this is what happened to Solomon?

Bullshit. Especially with reporters and news organizations, it's very often public knowledge. Just a few examples of many below.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...ia-controversy

https://fortune.com/2023/12/12/sport...ngs-ceo-fired/

https://www.newsweek.com/full-list-r...emarks-1837834

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65380349

https://www.washingtonpost.com/media...tgomery-fired/

https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/ne...training-camp/

What is just as interesting to me as Finn's lame and unfounded accusations: if Solomon wrote false or misleading stories and was "fired" from the Hill for doing so, why are his articles still available to read on the Hill's site? The Hill was supposed to have conducted an "exhaustive review" of Solomon's articles, but the articles haven't been taken down. Examples:

https://thehill.com/policy/national-...ed-classified/

https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...n-push-for-us/

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...-fetal-tissue/

[Chicks]

Who Is Tom Fitton? The Voter Fraud Propagandist Who Urged Trump to Ignore the Will of the People
https://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/...of-the-people/

Clearly Whell's kinda guy. :rolleyes :

[bobabode]

John F. Soloman -
https://archives.cjr.org/feature/something_fishy.php
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_S...al_commentator)
https://www.propublica.org/article/h...ine-conspiracy

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

Bullshit. Especially with reporters and news organizations, it's very often public knowledge. Just a few examples of many below.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...ia-controversy

https://fortune.com/2023/12/12/sport...ngs-ceo-fired/

https://www.newsweek.com/full-list-r...emarks-1837834

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65380349

https://www.washingtonpost.com/media...tgomery-fired/

https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/ne...training-camp/

What is just as interesting to me as Finn's lame and unfounded accusations: if Solomon wrote false or misleading stories and was "fired" from the Hill for doing so, why are his articles still available to read on the Hill's site? The Hill was supposed to have conducted an "exhaustive review" of Solomon's articles, but the articles haven't been taken down. Examples:

https://thehill.com/policy/national-...ed-classified/

https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...n-push-for-us/

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...-fetal-tissue/

Because The Hill has some pretty lame journalistic standards. That should be obvious by their willingness to hire a discredited clown like Solomon in the first place and then to keep his articles up after their internal investigation found that he wrote:

"(M)isleading and poorly attributed articles last year that asserted corruption by Joe Biden in his dealings with Ukraine during his time as vice president...

In effect, the Hill said Solomon amplified an inaccurate and one-sided narrative about the Bidens and Ukraine that was fed to him by Giuliani, “facilitated” by businessman Lev Parnas, who was working with Giuliani at the time..." (the same Giuliani who is facing boatloads of criminal and civil charges and the same Les Parnas who was later convicted for campaign finance crimes, wire fraud and false statements).

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifes...a77_story.html

Like Fox News, The Hill is unwilling to publish corrections or take down false articles. This unwillingness does not verify these articles, it shows The Hill's lack of journalistic standards (something that was already widely known prior to Solomon's cavalcade of lies).

At least we now know where you got the discredited Burisma story that you've tried to hawk here on a number of occasions. Instead of defending Solomon and his lies, you should perhaps engage in some soul-searching as to why you are so willing to gobble up and then spew such nonsense and lies.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by whell

Bullshit. Especially with reporters and news organizations, it's very often public knowledge. Just a few examples of many below.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...ia-controversy

https://fortune.com/2023/12/12/sport...ngs-ceo-fired/

https://www.newsweek.com/full-list-r...emarks-1837834

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65380349

https://www.washingtonpost.com/media...tgomery-fired/

https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/ne...training-camp/

What is just as interesting to me as Finn's lame and unfounded accusations: if Solomon wrote false or misleading stories and was "fired" from the Hill for doing so, why are his articles still available to read on the Hill's site? The Hill was supposed to have conducted an "exhaustive review" of Solomon's articles, but the articles haven't been taken down. Examples:

https://thehill.com/policy/national-...ed-classified/

https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...n-push-for-us/

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...-fetal-tissue/

You are nothing but a right wing hack.
Or as one of my close friends puts it, "No Fucking Common Sense".

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Instead of defending Solomon and his lies, you should perhaps engage in some soul-searching as to why you are so willing to gobble up and then spew such nonsense and lies.

When one has been radicalized...

[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Instead of defending Solomon and his lies, you should perhaps engage in some soul-searching as to why you are so willing to gobble up and then spew such nonsense and lies.

You are truly bankrupt when it comes to debating. What you call "defending Solomon and his lies" was simply me asking you to back up your posts that claim he was fired. You've been unable to do that so far, but in multiple post you spew about how Solomon is not credible.

So, when you can't defend your own posts and assertions, you can call others liars. You tell me I'm the one who needs "soul searching" when you're the one posting false info. What a freakin' hypocrite you've become!

You truly have nothing left to add to this segment of the thread, unless you want to take another shot at backing up your claims in earlier posts.

[whell]

Originally Posted by Rajoo

You are nothing but a right wing hack.
Or as one of my close friends puts it, "No Fucking Common Sense".

Typical. Can't back up what he posts, so he starts calling other folks names. Laughable.

[whell]

Originally Posted by bobabode

John F. Soloman -
https://archives.cjr.org/feature/something_fishy.php
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_S...al_commentator)
https://www.propublica.org/article/h...ine-conspiracy

As expected, these links say nothing about Solomon being fired. But thanks anyway,

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by whell

As expected, these links say nothing about Solomon being fired. But thanks anyway,

The question is and always was whether your source was full of shit, Mike. John Soloman is absolutely full of shit as is the Washington 'Moonie' Times. Get ahold of yourself, dude.