Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Economy

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-01-2023, 09:06 AM
whell whell is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
Meanwhile, while demanding a cut in spending, House Republicans lead the way in supporting earmarks. The top 6, 10 of the top 12, and 15 of the top 20 who requested earmarks are Republican. Fucking hypocrites.

Earmarking federal funds for their home districts continues to grow in popularity among House Republicans, with 152 GOP members and two nonvoting delegates participating in the process this year, a CQ Roll Call analysis found.

Nearly 70 percent of House Republicans are seeking earmarks this year, based on member request data compiled by the House Appropriations Committee. That's up from almost 60 percent of the conference last year and just over half the year before.

Overall, House members asked for 5,067 earmarks, a nearly 7 percent increase over last year, for a total of $19.4 billion, a more substantial increase of over 56 percent from last year's total amount requested of $12.4 billion.


https://rollcall.com/2023/04/28/hous...er-new-regime/
From your article:

The bulk of Weber’s requests were in the Energy-Water measure, the largest of which is a $260 million request for a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers project to improve floodgates along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Weber said 30 million tons of cargo, valued at $117 billion, pass through the waterway each year.

Michigan GOP Reps. Jack Bergman and freshman John James were second and third on the list, with Bergman asking for $465.8 million and James asking for $430.5 million.

However, those totals are inflated as the two shared a $394.1 million request for an Army Corps of Engineers project for a new lock at the Soo Locks, which connects Lake Superior and the lower Great Lakes.

The top Democratic requester, California’s Zoe Lofgren, was seventh overall, at $265.6 million. Lofgren’s leading request was $200 million for a risk management project for the Pajaro River in the Energy-Water measure.


These are requests to fund improvements in infrastructure, for which I believe funding has been approved under the bipartisan infrastructure spending bill. So, what's your beef?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-01-2023, 12:20 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
So, what's your beef?
Because the House FreeDumb Caucus has been adamantly opposed to earmarks.

The conservative House Freedom Caucus has come out swinging against the idea, voting to formally oppose any form of congressionally directed spending, “whether in the 117th Congress or any future Congress.” Caucus members argued that the practice is ripe for abuse and would only lead to “pork-barrel” spending.

“They’re a bad idea. I’m opposed to them,” said Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio), a member of the Freedom Caucus. “They’ve been described as a gateway drug toward corruption.”

“I am totally against it,” added Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), a co-founder of the group. “I don’t think Republicans should be supportive of earmarks.”


https://www.politico.com/news/2021/0...armarks-471344
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-01-2023, 12:32 PM
nailer's Avatar
nailer nailer is offline
Rational Anarchist
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
Because the House FreeDumb Caucus has been adamantly opposed to earmarks.

The conservative House Freedom Caucus has come out swinging against the idea, voting to formally oppose any form of congressionally directed spending, “whether in the 117th Congress or any future Congress.” Caucus members argued that the practice is ripe for abuse and would only lead to “pork-barrel” spending.

“They’re a bad idea. I’m opposed to them,” said Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio), a member of the Freedom Caucus. “They’ve been described as a gateway drug toward corruption.”

“I am totally against it,” added Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), a co-founder of the group. “I don’t think Republicans should be supportive of earmarks.”


https://www.politico.com/news/2021/0...armarks-471344
Which caucus members are asking for earmarks?
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-01-2023, 12:49 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by nailer View Post
Which caucus members are asking for earmarks?
The article I linked to provides a list. Within it, it also states:

Freedom Caucus members Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., Andy Harris, R-Md., and Ben Cline, R-Va., are among the new requesters this year.

So is Florida GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz, who was one of four Republicans voting "no" on the debt limit increase measure on Wednesday for not doing enough to curb spending.

Republicans dominate the list of top earmarkers by dollar amount, including the top six among House members.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-01-2023, 12:54 PM
nailer's Avatar
nailer nailer is offline
Rational Anarchist
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
The article I linked to provides a list. Within it, it also states:

Freedom Caucus members Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., Andy Harris, R-Md., and Ben Cline, R-Va., are among the new requesters this year.

So is Florida GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz, who was one of four Republicans voting "no" on the debt limit increase measure on Wednesday for not doing enough to curb spending.

Republicans dominate the list of top earmarkers by dollar amount, including the top six among House members.
Don't have time to read political articles. Too biased for my tastes. Rather spend it listening to music, reading books or watching the better content in the stream. Being outside and keeping physically active too. For instance, I'm off to visit a galaxy far far away.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-01-2023, 01:04 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by nailer View Post
Don't have time to read political articles. Too biased for my tastes. Rather spend it listening to music, reading books or watching the better content in the stream. Being outside and keeping physically active too. For instance, I'm off to visit a galaxy far far away.
I just got back from a 5 mile hike in the woods and a mile swim afterwards but still find time to read.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-01-2023, 02:46 PM
nailer's Avatar
nailer nailer is offline
Rational Anarchist
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
I just got back from a 5 mile hike in the woods and a mile swim afterwards but still find time to read.
My daily constitutional is four miles late in the day and a 40+ workout in the morning. When the heat hits they reverse. Just did 45 minutes of pulling out unwanted plants in the yard and scoped out another 45 minutes worth for tomorrow. Tomorrow is also give the groomed part of my homestead a trim day. Can't see paying someone else to do that.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-01-2023, 06:17 PM
whell whell is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
Because the House FreeDumb Caucus has been adamantly opposed to earmarks.

The conservative House Freedom Caucus has come out swinging against the idea, voting to formally oppose any form of congressionally directed spending, “whether in the 117th Congress or any future Congress.” Caucus members argued that the practice is ripe for abuse and would only lead to “pork-barrel” spending.

“They’re a bad idea. I’m opposed to them,” said Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio), a member of the Freedom Caucus. “They’ve been described as a gateway drug toward corruption.”

“I am totally against it,” added Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), a co-founder of the group. “I don’t think Republicans should be supportive of earmarks.”


https://www.politico.com/news/2021/0...armarks-471344
Some Repubs are, some are not.

You called them "hypocrites". Since you're a Dem voter, and Dems typically infuse budgets with earmarks, doesn't that make you a hypocrite?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:30 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.